[90]
CHAPTER VI
THE ADMINISTRATION OF STUDENT LOANS
The survey of Student loans made by the Student Loan Information
Bureau during the past year and by the Harmon Foundation during the
previous year shows that there is no uniformity in the administration
of Student loans in the various Colleges and universities. In formulating
policies for the administration of loans, it has not been possible to be
guided by prevailing methods, for each institution seems to have a pro-
cedure peculiarly its own. No two institutions are guided by the same
set of principles. There exists no distinguishable trend of thought, no
well worked-out policy making for a definite purpose or end. The
administration of loans to students has never been given, nor is it given
even today, the proper attention and place in the financial policies of
higher education.
In the working out of a policy for the administration of Student
loans, it is desirable therefore to lift all that is best from the various
methods in use and with this material construct a workable plan which
will approach, as near as possible, the ideal. There is no “yard stick”
with which to measure that which is best in the various plans. The selec-
tion of the best elements from the different Systems in use must be made
judiciously rather than scientifically and supplemented, where necessary,
with theoretical conclusions.
Methods of Administration
Loan funds are administered in two ways: the restricted method,
loaning the income from the fund only; and the revolving method, loan-
ing both income and principal. Taking the institutions as a whole, there
are many more funds administered under the restricted method than
there are under the revolving method. These conditions do prevail not-
withstanding the fact that of the 93 institutions which answered an
inquiry sent out by the Student Loan Information Bureau, 69 replied
that they favored the revolving fund. The replies are personal opinions
of the iijdividuals who are familiär with and in most cases responsible
for the administration of loans. The replies revealed opinions as follows:
69—favored revolving fund.
5—preferred restricted fund.
1—no experience with revolving fund.
1—doubtful.
16—no answer.