{10 PONTIFICIAE ACADEMIAE SCIENTIARVM SCRIPTA VARIA - 28 certainty it is not even possible to make an observation without disturbing the system itself. We should not press the question of neutrality in an extreme way, but take a broad view that for certain purposes certain models would be more appropriate than others. The point stressed by Professor LEONTIEF is extremely important the validity and also the precision and the effectiveness of a model to serve certain purposes which may be purely explanatory or may be decision making or may be forecasting or may be of other types. I think this raises questions of substance which we should discuss; and we should, among ourselves at least, provisionally agree on what kind of words we should use. WoLD I am not sure whether there is really any disagreement between Prof. Arrars and Prof. FriscH, but their debate does confirm Prof. MAHALANOBIS” view that it is a good thing to clarify our terminology — not necessarily to establish it for the indefinite future, but at least for the purpose of our discussion during the Study Week. The question has been posed: What is a decision model, and how does it differ from a forecasting model? It is my undestanding that decision model and policy model are essentially the same notion. If so, the question can be answered along the lines of a famous argument by the distinguished Swedish economist GUNNAR MyrpAL. Political actions, including actions of economic policy, are based on value judgements, and it is typical that the judgements are radically different for members of different political parties. The analysis of economic policy and other decision systems takes the form of a policy model, where the value judgements underlying alternative political actions are included as specified hypotheses, hypotheses which in themselves are politically neutral. In this way the policy model becomes, in principle, an instrument for strictly scientific analysis of alternative lines of political action. ‘1] Stone - pag. 108