206 THE BALANCE OF INDEBTEDNESS, 1918-28
Revising the estimates for the pre-war period in accordance
with the difference in money values it is estimated (i) that the
disbursements of travellers from abroad while in Australia now
average £150 for first-class passengers, and £80 for all other
classes; and (ii) that the average expenditure by Australians
abroad amounts to £300 for first-class passengers, and £150 for
all other classes, inclusive of the cost of transport. In making
this estimate, and in computing the higher charges for steamer
and railway travel, hotel accommodation, and the different
services that are in demand by tourists, every opportunity has
been taken for consulting bank officials, responsible officers in
steamship companies, hotel managers, and others. From every
point of view the present estimate of the cost to Australia of
such services, amounting to less than £10 millions per year, will
not appear surprisingly high ; and the estimate was confirmed by
the slightly higher computation made independently by the
officials of Australia House.
One further note should be made concerning the somewhat
high figures for 1920 and 1921. During these years the rate of
travel from Australia was, for several reasons, abnormally high.
[t represents, to some extent, a reaction from the restrictions on
travel during the war; but, in addition, very many people were
anxious to visit Europe for a variety of motives that need not be
discussed here. Further, the high prices and high profits of the
post-war boom were not without their effect in placing the means
for travel at the disposal of many business people. In the light of
all the circumstances the high figures at the end of the period are
more difficult of explanation. (See Tables XLVI, XLVIL.)
ITT. Capital Investments and Interest Payments.
In the years since 1920 a great deal of attention has been
given to the financial circumstances of the Commonwealth ; and
the British investment market, in particular, has adopted a
very critical attitude towards any enlargement of borrowing
programmes. The chief benefit arising from this more careful
scrutiny of loan projects for the investigator has lain in the more
careful compilation and comparison of statistics of capital in-
vestment ; and, at any rate for the three main groups of public
loans, the true facts of the case are more easily obtainable. As
a consequence of the more careful regard for the disposition of