72 RELIGION, COLONISING AND TRADE
Decker proposed © to lay one tax on the consumers of
luxuries and take off all our other taxes, excises and
customs, and when that is done to make all our ports
free.” 1 He was eloquent as to the harm done to
British trade by high customs duties and, like Roger
Coke, attacked the monopolies of chartered companies,
their * past villainies,” as he pleasantly phrased it. He
attacked also the navigation act. © As this act makes
our navigation dear, it for that reason deprives us of
the fishing trade, the great nursery of seamen.” He
advised that the British colonies should be allowed to
export their raw products direct in British ships to any
part of Europe, inasmuch as if they were given such a
field for their unmanufactured articles, they would
cease to wish to manufacture, and it would result in
‘ preventing the people in our plantations on the
Continent rebelling for ages to come.’
Writing when rebellion had already begun, Adam
Smith advocated giving the colonists representation in
the British Parliament ; and for many years past others
had given similar advice. Benjamin Franklin had
favoured such a course, and it was very strongly urged
by Thomas Pownall, who wrote with authority as
having been Governor of Massachusetts and other
American colonies. The first part of his book on
‘The Administration of the British Colonies > was
published in 1764, the year after the Peace of Paris
was signed, confirming to Great Britain the rich fruits
of the Seven Years War. He pleaded that Great
Britain may be no more considered as the kingdom of
this isle only, with many appendages of provinces,
4 Second edition (Dublin, 1749), pp. 45, 53-4, 75 and 179.