Report on profit-sharing and labour co-partnership in the United Kingdom

Bibliographic data

Monograph

Identifikator:: 1016336950

URN:: urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-27123

Document type:: Monograph

Title:: Report on profit-sharing and labour co-partnership in the United Kingdom

Place of publication:: London

Publisher:: His Majesty's Stationery Office

Year of publication:: 1912

Scope:: 1 Online-Ressource (160 Seiten)

Digitisation:: 2018

Collection:: Economics Books

Usage license:: Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:: Monograph

Structure type:: Chapter

Title:: II. Profit sharing and co-partnership in private firms and companies

Collection:: Economics Books

12 II.—PRIVATE FIRMS AND COMPANIES. in bonuses a total of more than £172,000) remarks as follows :■— “ 1 wonder how Sir George (Sir George Livesey, Chairman of the “ South Metropolitan Gas Company) would deal with such a “business as ours, where, during the 16 years our profit-sharing “ scheme has been in force, we have paid in bonuses more than “ twice the amount of our ordinary capital, and we couldn’t, if “ we wanted to, find employment for such an accumulation of “ capital as these bonuses represent. With a Gas Company, “ which is always increasing its mains and adding to capital “ account, it is different. We want to keep our capital account “ as low as possible.” In an article on Co-partnership the Engineer, of May 31, .1912, describes a profit-sharing scheme under which a Company at the end of each year pays 5 per cent, dividend on its shares “ and the remaining profits are apportioned between capital and “ labour in the ratio that the capital bears to the wages bill. “ The labour portion is distributed amongst all the workers gro “rata with their wages, but not in the form of money. The “ distribution is made in ordinary shares of the Company, which, “ of course, take their dividends in the ordinary way in succeed- tT ing years.” This journal observes that under this scheme “ in the course of time the business must become seriously over- “ capitalised. Already the majority of the shares are owned by “ the workpeople, and these all, with the exception of such “ transfers as are made when, for example, a co-partner dies “ or leaves the firm, represent new created stock. Clearly there “ must be a limit to that kind of thing. A natural limit would “ no doubt be reached when the capital became so great that “ the dividends dwindled to the 5 per cent, due to shareholders. “ There would then be no new issue of stock, and although every “ shareholder would be concerned in maintaining the 5 per cent. “ dividend, there would clearly not be the stimulus that there is “ at present.” Complete lists of the profit-sharing schemes notified to the Department up to August 1, 1912, are contained in Appen dices A and B (pp. 95-114), particulars relating, to schemes which have been abandoned being given separately from those relating to schemes in which Profit-sharing is at present in force. In every case the year of starting Profit-sharing is given, together with the nature of the business carried on by the employer, the number of the employees, and the form in which the bonus is paid. In the case of abandoned schemes, the year and the cause of abandon ment are also stated; while for schemes at present in force particulars are added as to the number of employees entitled to participate at the end of 1911 (or in 1912, in the case of schemes started since 1911). In Appendices C and D 1pp. 115-125) Tables are given for existing and for abandoned schemes relating to the investments of employees in their employers’ businesses. The Summary Table on the next page has been compiled from the information given in the Appendices referred to above : •—

Access restriction

Copyright

fullscreen: Report on profit-sharing and labour co-partnership in the United Kingdom

Monograph

Chapter

Table of contents

Download

Monograph

Chapter

This page

Image fragment

Citation links

Citation recommendation