Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

error

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: error

Monograph

Identifikator:
1689946490
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-101093
Document type:
Monograph
Title:
Die deutsche Wirtschaft
Place of publication:
Berlin
Publisher:
Hobbing
Year of publication:
1926
Scope:
528 Seiten
Illustrationen
Digitisation:
2020
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:
Monograph
Structure type:
Chapter
Title:
15. Kommunale Wirtschaftsbetriebe
Collection:
Economics Books

Contents

Table of contents

  • Responsible government in the Dominions
  • Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 2)
  • Title page
  • Contents
  • Chapter VIII. The constitutional relations of the houses
  • Part IV. The federations and the union // Chapter I. The dominion of Canada
  • Part IV. The federations and the union // Chapter II. The commonwealth of Australia
  • Part V. Imperial control over dominion administration and legislation // Chapter I. The principles of imperial control
  • Part V. Imperial control over dominion administration and legislation // Chapter II. Imperial control over the inernal affairs of the dominions
  • Part V. Imperial control over dominion administration and legislation // Chapter III. The treatment of native races
  • Part V. Imperial control over dominion administration and legislation // Chapter IV. The immigration of coloured races

Full text

CHAP, 1] THE DOMINION OF CANADA 673 
tannot disallow state laws : the obvious answer is that it 
can ask the Imperial Government to do so, and that Govern- 
nent would have no hesitation in doing so if the Act violated 
in any way the Imperial compact. 
The principle determining the whole matter was indeed 
clearly laid down by the Privy Council in the case of Bank of 
Toronto v. Lambe,! in which it was held by the Privy Council 
that the Legislature of Quebec has power to impose a direct 
bax, under s. 91 (2) of the British North America Act, on incor- 
Porated companies doing business in the province. The 
argument was there raised that the tax might be so heavy 
that it would defeat the Dominion power to incorporate 
Companies at all, and such arguments had been used success- 
fully in the United States Courts. The Privy Council dis- 
missed it as beside the mark :— 
People who are trusted with the great power of making 
laws for property and civil rights may well be trusted to 
levy taxes : they have to construe the express words of an 
Act of Parliament which makes an elaborate distribution 
of the whole field of legislative authority between two 
legislative bodies, and at the same time provides for the 
federated provinces a carefully balanced constitution under 
which no one of the parts can make law for itself except 
under the control of the whole acting through the Governor- 
General. And the question they have to answer is whether 
One body or the other has power to make a given law. If 
they find that on the due consideration of the Act a legislative 
Power falls within s. 92, it would be quite wrong of them 
to deny its existence because by some possibility it may 
be abused or may limit the range which otherwise would be 
open to the Dominion Parliament? 
i The problem, then, is how to give each section a fair mean- 
ng, and neither to aggrandize the Dominion at the cost of 
the provinces, nor to make the Dominion helpless to carry 
Out its fundamental purposes. A few examples will illustrate 
the main lines of solution. 
"12 App. Cas. 575, followed in Fortier v. Lambe, 25 8. C. R. 22 This 
tase was cited with approval in Peterswald v. Bartley, 1 C. L. R. . 8 
distinguished in Deakin v. Webb, 1 C. L. R. 585. _ 
PCE The Liquidators of the Maritime Bank of Canada v. The Receiver 
General of New Brunswick, [1892] A. C. 437, at pp. 441-3. 
12799 '
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Volume

METS METS (entire work) MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

Chapter

PDF RIS

This page

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Volume

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Chapter

To quote this structural element, the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

Responsible Government in the Dominions. Clarendon Pr., 1912.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

Which word does not fit into the series: car green bus train:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.