Report of the Royal Commission on Labour in India

Bibliographic data

Monograph

Identifikator:: 1850495947

URN:: urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-233603

Document type:: Monograph

Title:: Report of the Royal Commission on Labour in India

Place of publication:: London

Publisher:: His Majesty's Stationery Off.

Year of publication:: 1931

Scope:: xviii, 580 S.; graph. Darst., Kt.

Digitisation:: 2022

Collection:: Economics Books

Usage license:: Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:: Monograph

Structure type:: Chapter

Title:: Chapter XVI. - Workmen's compensation

Collection:: Economics Books

214 CHAPTER XVI. appeal to the High Court. The Government of India have therefore suggested giving the Commissioner and the High Court the necessary powers to prevent the disbursement of money which may be found ultimately not to be due to the recipients. This suggestion has met with approval from many of those consulted ; but apprehension has been expressed that the amendment might inflict great hardship on de- pendants and others owing to the long time frequently necessary for the decision of an appeal. We see no satisfactory way of eliminating this risk ; but it would be possible to minimise it by requiring employers who apply for the withholding of the compensation to deposit a substantial amount with the Commissioner, e.g., Rs. 100 or some fraction of the compensation, which, if the necessary order was passed, would be treated as a fee and distributed for purposes of maintenance to the dependants. As a matter of fact, appeals are only possible if a substantial question of law is involved, and their importance to the employer lies. in many cases. not in the sum at stake but in the question at issue. (2) We think that the Act should make it possible to impose a fine for failure to furnish any return required by it. A similar penalty should be prescribed for failure to comply with the provisions relating to fur- nishing notices of fatal accidents, etc., which we have recommended above, if these recommendations are adopted. (v) The provisions in section 5 ‘of the Act for the calculation of wages give some difficulty in application to ceses where the workman has been engaged for a very short period before the accident, e.g., less than a month. A clause to obviate the difficulty was included in the amending bill introduced in the Legislative Assembly in 1928 ; but it was eliminated before the hill was passed because there were doubts as to its equity and it was desired to avoid making any amendments of a controversial charac- ter at that time. The clause is based on principles adopted elsewhere, and we consider it suitable for adoption. Employers’ Liability. Before concluding this chapter we deal with a question which, while not strictly a matter affecting workmen’s compensation legislation, is connected with it. Persons injured by accident may have a remedy by a suit for damages against their employer in the civil court, and It is suggested that the law there applicable is inequitable because two defences may be evoked by the employer to defeat claims which he should justly be called upon to meet. One is the defence of ‘“ common employment ”’ by which an employer can plead that an acci- dent was due to the default of a fellow-workman, and the other is the defence of “ assumed risk ”’ by which an employer is not liable for injury caused to workmen through the ordinary risks of employment, and a work- man is presumed to have assumed risks which were apparent when he enter- ed upon his occupation. When the Indian Workmen’s Compensation Act was first introduced, it had, in addition to the provisions for workmen’s compensation, clauses designed to abrogate these defences in certain cases ; but the Joint Select Committee of the Legislature deleted the

Access restriction

Copyright

fullscreen: Report of the Royal Commission on Labour in India

Monograph

Chapter

Table of contents

Download

Monograph

Chapter

This page

Image fragment

Citation links

Citation recommendation