Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Der Antwerpener Hafen und die Pariser Wirtschaftskonferenz

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: Der Antwerpener Hafen und die Pariser Wirtschaftskonferenz

Monograph

Identifikator:
886929202
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-4833
Document type:
Monograph
Author:
Oboussier, Max
Title:
Der Antwerpener Hafen und die Pariser Wirtschaftskonferenz
Place of publication:
Berlin
Publisher:
Verlag von Georg Stilke
Year of publication:
1917
Scope:
1 Online-Ressource (112 Seiten)
Digitisation:
2017
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:
Monograph
Structure type:
Chapter
Title:
II. Der Güterverkehr
Collection:
Economics Books

Contents

Table of contents

  • The Industrial Revolution
  • Title page
  • Contents

Full text

524 LAISSEZ FAIRE 
planted, it took root in Lancashire and developed steadily till 
about 1740, when an era of more rapid progress began®. The 
competition of the East India Company was that which the 
manufacturers had most reason to fear, and though the cloth 
they wove of cotton on a linen warp had a practical monopoly 
in the home market? they were liable to be undersold by the 
but doth company in foreign markets. Arkwright's inventions, by 
cout now . . 2 
be made of Spinning a firmer cotton thread than had hitherto been pro- 
ti . 3 . 
only, and Curable and one which was suitable for the warp’, made it 
foreigners possible to manufacture a cloth on terms which rendered it 
acceptable in markets in all parts of the world. 
The effect of Arkwright’s success was to open up to a trade, 
that had hitherto been conducted on a small scale, the possi- 
bility of enormous and indefinite expansion. Materials could 
be obtained in considerable quantities from the East and the 
Bahamas; and in the last decades of the eighteenth century 
increasing supplies were procured from the southern States?’ 
I The progress was not uncheckered, however, and was closely dependent on 
the supply of materials. The evidence given before the Select Committee of 1751 
seems fo show that their French and German rivals could obtain the linen yarn 
used as warp more cheaply than the English manufacturers could procure if 
trom Ireland (Reports from Committees of the House of Commons, Reprints, First 
Series, 1m. 291, 292). In order to assist them it was resolved that the duties on the 
importation of foreign linen yarn should be reduced (Commons Journals, XXvL 
234). The English had an advantage in the possession of cotton islands; but 
their continental rivals offered better prices and secured a large part of the crop 
Reports, op. cit. 296). There were further complaints of decline in the manu. 
Iacture in 1766. 'T., Letters on the Utility of Machinery, 9. 
2 9 Geo. II. c. 4. 
8 Linen had been previously used for this purpose. In 1774 an Act was passed 
which repealed 7 Geo. L. c. 7 and rendered it possible for Arkwright to take full 
advantage of the improvement. 14 Geo. III. ¢. 72. 
4 The average annual import of cotton wool for the years 1701 to 1705 was 
1,170,881Ibs.; it rose in the following decade and from 1716-20 averaged 
2,178.287 Ibs. For quinquennial periods after the invention of the jenny and frame 
L771—=1775 . . . 4,764,589, 
1776-1780 . . . 6,706,013, 
1781—1785 . . . 10,941,934, 
1786-1790 . . . 25,448,270. 
In 1800 it reached 56,010,732 and in 1810, 136,488,935, but after this year there 
was a remarkable drop (as low as 50,966,000 in 1813), and matters did not mend 
till after the close of the war. Guest, op. cit. 51. 
5 The cultivation of cotton had been introduced into the Carolinas and Georgia 
from the Bahamas about the time of the War of Independence. Whitney's in- 
vention of the cotton-gin which separated the fibre from the seed, and prepared 
the cotton for export, gave an immense stimulus to the production; in 1794, 
Jne million six hundred thousand pounds were exported. Leone Levi, History, 83. 
A.D. 1776 
—1850.
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Monograph

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

This page

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Monograph

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

The Industrial Revolution. The University Press, 1922.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

How much is one plus two?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.