Die Technik des wirtschaftlichen Verkehrs

Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 1)

Bibliographic data

Monograph

Identifikator:: 890185476

URN:: urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-7558

Document type:: Monograph

Title:: A magyar korona országainak betegsegélyző pénztárai 1898-ban = Die Krankenkassen der Länder der ungarischen Krone im Jahre 1898

Place of publication:: Budapest

Publisher:: Pester Buchdruckerei-Actien-Gesellschaft

Year of publication:: 1901

Scope:: 1 Online-Ressource (164, 131 Seiten)

Digitisation:: 2017

Collection:: Economics Books

Usage license:: Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:: Monograph

Structure type:: Chapter

Title:: I. Allgemeiner Bericht

Collection:: Economics Books

CHAP. 111] REPUGNANCY OF COLONIAL LAWS 423 Companies Arrangement Act, 1870, is not applicable to the Colonies, people in which are therefore not bound by an arrangement under the Act, although in bankruptcy matters it is otherwise under the Bankruptcy Act, 1883.1 Again, it has been held that the levying by Canada of a duty on foreign vessels which are imported into Canada to be registered there is not contrary to the Merchant Shipping Act, 1894.2 The Mortmain Act of 1891, according to Mayor, &c.of Canter- bury v. Wyburn,?® does not apply to a Colonial will. The Fine Arts Copyright Act of 1862 does not apply to the Dominions according to the decision in Graves & Co.. Lid. v. Gorriet !' Callender Sykes & Co. v. Colonial Secretary of Lagos, [1891] A. C. 460; see Dicey, Conflict of Laws,? pp. 329 seq. * Algoma Central Railway Co. v. The King, [1903] A. C. 478. * [1895] A.C. 89. Cf. Carrigan v. Redwood, 30 N. Z. L. R. 244, where it is held that a grant for the purpose of saying masses was valid, the English law in force by adoption in New Zealand not including the Acts forbidding such grants. But see as to Wyburn’s case, Dicey. Conflict of Laws? p. 669, n. 1. 4 {19031 A. C. 496, In Phillips v. Eyre, 6 Q. B. 1, it was discussed whether Magna Charta was not in force in Jamaica so as to render void the Indemnity Act passed for Eyre, but it was held otherwise. In The Bishop of Natal v. Wills, 1867 N. L. R. 60, and The Bishop of Natal v. Green, 1868 N. L. R. 138, will be found a discussion of the extension of the Imperial Acts regarding the ecclesiastical powers of the Crown to Natal.

Access restriction

Copyright

fullscreen: Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 1)

Monograph

Chapter

Table of contents

Download

Volume

Chapter

This page

Image fragment

Citation links

Citation recommendation