26
“dovetailing” the seasonal trades necessarily involves squeez
ing out, once for all, the unnecessary surplus of labourers who
now compete for part of the work. In fact, nothing can be
done in this direction until this surplus is assured that it will
be at once provided for. In addition, there will always be the
odds and ends of men dropping out of place for one reason or
another, the weak men, the irregular men, the men who have
“words” with the foreman, and so on. There would, even
under a Socialist Government owning all the means of produc
tion, be the men displaced by a new machine or a new process.
Thus, it is certainly not sufficient to provide a National Labour
Exchange: it is not sufficient to start a scheme of Insurance.
There will still be unemployed men to be provided for; and
they cannot nowadays be thrust back into the Poor Law.
The Government must not be allowed to shirk this part of the
problem. To regularise employment, to give every labourer
who is employed at all nearly a full week’s work every week
of the year—an inestimable boon—involves a sort of surgical
operation. We cannot do it without taking care to find places
for the men who will be, once for all, squeezed out. The
Minority Report shows how it can be done—by “halving” boy
and girl labour and insisting on half-time instruction up to
eighteen, by reducing excessive hours on railways and tram
ways, and by enabling widows with young children to abstain
from industrial work.
THE RIGHT TO WORK.
Rut there are some for whom provision must be made at
all times, the odds and ends of men who drop out, from this
trade or that, for this reason or that—we need not inquire
why, for they cannot be allowed to starve, and it is the worst
of all policies to let them be demoralised or brutalised by the
Poor Law. For these, and indeed for all men who are un
employed and in distress from whatever cause, as we must
necessarily provide maintenance, we ought to provide some
useful occupation, some educational work. This, to my mind,
is the proper meaning of the “Right to Work.” We don’t
need to set these men to produce more commodities for ex
change, because this is apt in practice to mean “doing another
man out of his job.” We had better let the work to which we
put them be educational in its character. For such men the
Minority Report proposes that there should stand always open
the Minister of Labour’s Educational Training Establish
ments, day or residential. These provisions would be
made for a man (or a woman), for whose work there
was, from one end of the kingdom to the other,
on the testimony of the National Labour Exchange
itself, temporarily no demand ; the man (or woman) meanwhile
getting full maintenance whilst under training, with allowance