rT)
Property and Inheritance.
To put the difference in a more summary way,
about 6 per cent. of the persons own half the income
of the country, but three-quarters of the property.
And the inequality of property, while it is greater
than the inequality of income, has even less economic
justification.
tak
the
ace
che
rel:
The Influence of Inheritance.
The explanation is to be found in the right of
inheritance. Personal qualities, exceptional ability
or industry, do not survive their possessor ; accu-
mulations of wealth can be transmitted to descend-
ants. Thus the effects of Inequality are cumulative ;
the advantage gained by one generation of a family
provides a start in the race for wealth in the next
generation. And the change in the form of property
that we have noted enhances this cumulative effect,
Formerly, when ownership and use of capital were
indissolubly associated, the intrinsic difficulty of
administering and holding together an estate in-
creased disproportionately as the estate increased,
and the fact that the descendants of the exceptional
person who created the family fortune rarely inherited
his exceptional ability was a constant influence
making for the disposal of large accumulations.
This influence was counteracted by the practice
of converting large fortunes into land, and tying up
landed estates by strict settlements ; but the strictest
settlement could not protect an estate from the
incompetence and folly of the heir who would have
to administer it. To-day we have changed all that.
By the separation of ownership and use, and the
vesting of ownership in gilt-edged securities, ground-
rents, and the like, administered perhaps by con-
servative investment trusts, we have made it possible
for an heir to draw the income of his estate without
sha
fro
of
jus
ind
an
hig
out
pol
leas
OW!
pla
per
the
bu.
ind
of -
eve
Co
the
his
pa
210
Tes
to
he
1m