6
- it is, except in a very few places, on the Navy that the
burden of countering this menace falls, because we have no
territory from which our own aeroplanes can fly. Where we
- have territory from which our aeroplanes can fly, the
assistance of air force squadrons will be of vital importance.
. These remarks are in no way intended ‘to belittle the poten-
_ tialities of air power, indeed the day may come when the
capital ship. may be mainly an aircraft carrier or even spread
out wings and fly. (Laughter.) The present Board of Admiralty
and the Naval Staff are fully alive to the great value of air
. power at sea, and will spare no endeavour to develop it, but
as matters stand to-day, we sea-going sailors know that there
are many days in the year when the existing type of aircraft
can neither fly on nor off the sea, nor on nor off an aircraft
carrier. So it will be seen that the advent of the air arm has
added to rather than ameliorated our difficulties at sea and the
expenses of safeguarding our sea borne commerce. To return
to the Mercantile Marine, it needs no words of mine to tell you
how gallantly they played their part in the War—(Cheers)—
. whether in bringing us our food, or other vital necessities in
spite of the submarines, or whether in the dangerous work of
- sweeping up mines or hunting submarines. (Cheers) We
all know that, should the supreme test come once again, they
will not fail us—(Cheers)—and the Navy also will not be
behindhand in playing their part, if you will give us the men and
the ships.” You may ask: How many men and ships do you
want ? Well, the number of men is governed by the number
of ships, and the number of ships is governed by three things.
Firstly, at the Imperial Conference of 1921, it was decided
that our naval strength must never be inferior to that of the
strongest Naval Power. (Hear, hear.) I need not assure
you that this is the minimum requirement for the safety of
the Empire. (Hear, hear.) Secondly, the Washington
Agreement achieved a limitation in capital ships and aircraft
carriers. Thirdly, our requirements in cruisers for protecting
our wide trade. In this latter respect our requirements are
far greater than those of any other nation, as the Empire is
dependent on its sea communications. It is true that the
‘Washington Agreement limited the displacement and armament
of cruisers, but placed no restriction on numbers, and, of all
.the great Powers, we alone have no building programme in
cruiser construction. It is true that, at the moment, in
numbers we have a superiority over any other single Power,
though not a superiority having regard to our world-wide
commitments and geographical position, and even then only
in. small cruisers constructed during the war for war in the
North Sea, and not comparable with those which are included