z EMPLOYEE REPRESENTATION
back and forth, winning sometimes the fruit of others victories, but
more often suffering from their determination to “go it ‘alone.’
The public has gradually been forced to assume the task of judging
as to the merits of the contestants; and through the instrument of
government it has attempted to intercede in hope of preserving for
those groups in the community not engaged in the warfare some
semblance of peace and order. The public in whose behalf an
outraged press or excited government officialdom has taken up
its verbal cudgels has been a shifting and motley assortment of
persons more or less seriously annoyed by quarrels which often
directly did not concern them. Interference with the even tenor of
their way has more often aggravated these persons than a sincere
concern for the social function of production. Their animus has
generally been directed toward the strikers, despite the fact that
strikes are often no more the fault of those who strike—the em-
ployees—than of employers whose inability or unwillingness to satisfy
the legitimate desires of employees precipitates the situation which
causes them to strike. It is coming to be recognized, however, that
‘strikes are merely symptoms of more fundamental maladjustments,
injustices and economic disturbances which produce unrest, dis-
content, and bitterness among the ever-increasing number of industrial
workers.”
Conflict manifested in unrest when not in open strife, continually
augmented by the control-seeking tactics employed by both of the
contending forces, has sapped untold energy from the real business
of industry—production. The mechanisms each side has contrived
for defensive purposes have served largely to stimulate counteraction
by the other. Labor organizations, lacking obvious concern for
furtherance of production so long as the fruits of such endeavors
remained under control of employers, and while the basic, material
needs of their constituencies were still unmet, have had little or no
incentive to employ any but negative measures.
’ Ibid., pp. 18-19.
10 Doten, C. W., “Strikes and Lockouts in the United States,” in Federated
American Engineering Societies, Waste in Industry, p. 314.
=2