xxii
CONTENTS
Sec. 379. Case of the “Eumaeus”
380. Case of the “Poona”
381. Cases of the “Michigan” and the “St. Tudno”
382. Status of Goods the Produce of Enemy Soil
383. German Decisions
CHAPTER XIII. CONTRABAND OF WAR
Sec.
384. Importance During the World War
385. Carriage of Contraband No Violation of Inter-
national Law
386. Distinction Between Absolute and Conditional
Contraband
387. Necessity of Hostile Destination
388. The Doctrine of Continuous Voyage
389. Contraband May Include Property
in the Mails
390. The Same.—Decisions of Prize Courts
391. What Constitutes Hostile Destination
392. Whose Intention Is Decisive as to Hostile Destina-
tion? View of British Prize Courts
393. The Same.—View of the German Prize Court
394. The Date at Which Hostile Destination Must
Exist
395. The Same, Continued.—View of the French Prize
Council
396. Proof of Hostile Destination —Burden of Proof
397. The Same, Continued —Admission of Extrinsic
Evidence
398. The Same.—Neutral Protests
399. The Same.—Justification by the Prize Courts
400. Proof Derived from the Ship’s Papers
101. Presumptions of Hostile Destination—Rules of
Declaration of London
102. Establishment of New Presumptions by Belligerent
Governments
103. Interpretation and Application of Presumptions.
Goods Consigned to Enemy Ports
104. The Same, Continued —Ship Touching at Inter-
mediate Enemy Port
105. Goods Destined for the Enemy Government or
Armed Forces
406. Consignments to Agents of Enemy in Neutral
Territory
407. Fraudulent Concealment
408. Consignments to Other Than Bona Fide Consignees
510