CONTENTS 
xxii1 
Sec. 409. Consignments to Enemy Fortified Places and Bases 
of Supplies 
410. Presumption in Case of Consignments to Order 
411. Interpretation of Term “Consignments to Order” 
412. Presumption of Hostile Destination When Papers 
Do Not Indicate Consignee. Consignments to 
the N. O. T. and Similar Bodies 
413. Hostile Destination Presumed When Imports into 
Neutral Country Adjacent to Enemy Territory 
Largely Exceeded Pre-War Importations 
414. Inferences Resulting from Enemy Government 
Control of Food Supplies 
415. Proof in Rebuttal of the Presumption of Hostile 
Destination. German Decisions 
416. The Same.—Italian Jurisprudence 
417. The Same.—British Decisions 
418. Neutral Embargoes Against Re-exportation Not 
Conclusive as to Innocent Destination 
419. Continuous Voyage. View of the Prize Courts 
420. Circumstances Under Which Applied 
421. View of the British Government and Prize Courts 
422. Interpretation of the Conception “Common Stock” 
423. The Same.—French Interpretation 
424. The Same —German Decisions 
CHAPTER XIV. CoNTRABAND OF WAR (CONTINUED). RIGHT 
AND Duty OF SEARCH. UNNEUTRAL SERVICE . . . 
Sec. 425. Provisions of Article 40 of Declaration of London 
426. Case of the “Hakan” 
427. The Element of Knowledge on the Part of the 
Shipowner: Knowledge of the Character of the 
Goods Sufficient to Justify Condemnation 
428. Deliberate Abstention on Part of Owner from Ac- 
quiring Knowledge Constitutes Ground for Con- 
demnation 
429. Knowledge on Part of Charterer Does Not Affect 
Shipowner with Such Knowledge 
430. Knowledge of Master and Charterer 
431. Proof of Knowledge on Part of Owner Not Neces- 
sary Under Article 40 of Declaration of London 
432. Article 40 of Declaration of London Applied in 
Case of Continuous Voyage 
433. Provision of Article 38 of Declaration of London 
434. Interpretation by British Prize Court. Case of 
the “Alwina’” 
575