28 AN ECONOMIST'S PROTEST: 1915 IIT
eT I
Eh SA
Then the publics of each of the two countries begin to think
that the other is not only preparing, which is a fact, but also
intending war. There never was anything which excelled
bellicose dispositions in the capacity for making a living by
taking in each other’s washing.
The belief that war takes place chiefly because it is possible, that
the bare possibility makes countries provide for it, and that the
provision eventually brings it about, makes me entirely distrust
all schemes which admit the possibility. So long as you have
separate national military forces you will necessarily have pre-
parations for war and war itself. Where you have not such
forces, at the worst you can have civil war, which, owing to the
insufficiency of its material equipment, is becoming a less and
less serious matter in comparison with international war. The
only way to stop international wars is to suppress all separate
national military forces and consequently put an end to all
strategic jealousies and fears. Mere limitation of forces is
impracticable, and probably on the whole would be mischievous
if it were practicable, as it would be likely to give rise to more
suspicion and nervousness. A people will be quieter and more
peaceable if they think they have done all they can to make
themselves secure, than if they are bound by some compact
not to do quite so much on consideration of some other party
doing the same.
But, you say, is it not absurd to suppose that states will
entirely suppress their military forces ?
Before we come to that question let me ask whether it is not
absurd to suppose that after the war we shall proceed exactly
as before it.
)
[The part of a letter to Professor Allyn Young which was sent by
him to the New York Evening Post and was printed in that paper on
May 14, 1915.]
I am in hopes that we are nearing the end of international
anarchy, as international animosities seem to me to be rapidly
becoming more and more artificial : they are for the most part
worked up by persons who are persuaded that something or
other is necessary for the strategic safety of their country, and
if we could once put strategy out of the question there would,