244
BANKING STANDARDS
assets, the higher or lower, respectively, the ratios of interest on
deposits. Neither positive nor negative correlation obtains, how-
ever, between the net percentage deviations of ratios of interest
and discounts on borrowed money and percentage deviations of
salaries and wages.
Positive correlation, found to obtain between the district devia-
tions of ratios of salaries and wages and of interest on deposits,
should not, it is believed, be interpreted as of a causal order. The
reasons for this belief are as follows: At a given time, the larger
the proportion of time deposits to gross deposits, the smaller the
ratios of wage and salary expense to earning assets, and the
larger the ratios of interest on deposits to earning assets. The
positive correlation, found in Table 144, is due to the fact that
during the years 1919 to 1925 there was an upward trend in both
series.
The inverse correlation between ratios of salaries and wages
and of ratios of interest on borrowed money is due to the fact
that, for the period 1919-1925, the direction of change in the
ratios of the first series was generally upward and in those of
the second series generally downward. When yearly deviations
in the respective series are paired, the correlation, therefore, tends
to be of the negative type. It would be perfect only if a plus
deviation in one series were always accompanied by a negative
deviation in the other, and vice versa.
(2) Interest on Deposits
The average amounts of interest paid on deposits, relative to
earning assets, by all member banks in each of the Federal Re-
serve districts by years weré analyzed with respect to norms and
trends in Chapter VI. In later chapters, the types and degrees of
correlation obtaining between each of a number of banking series
and interest payments in this form were given in various tabular
summaries. There is no necessity of repeating what has been said
relative to such correlations in each of which interest payments
on deposits, in the form of ratios to earning assets, were treated
as the dependent variable. Neither is it advisable, because of
£ See Frederic H. Curtiss, “Operating Costs and Profits in 1925,” Federal Reserve
Bank of Boston, from which this relationship may be determined for banks in the
Boston district.