Contents: Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 3)

1342 THE JUDICIARY [PART VI 
to follow from that decision that the right of amotion is 
absolute in the case of all officers, whether holding by patent 
or not, unless they hold during good behaviour. On that 
assumption the only officers to which the Act still applies 
are such officers as hold during good behaviour, and are 
appointed by patent ; that is, in the self-governing Colonies 
practically only the judges and a few other officers! But it 
may safely be assumed that an amotion will not be resorted 
to again in a self-governing Colony. The constitutional 
mode of procedure is clearly that laid down in so many 
Constitutional Acts, an address either separately or jointly 
from the Houses of the Colonial Legislature on the model 
of the procedure in the United Kingdom itself. 
There is, however, a distinction between those cases in 
which the power to remove is vested in the Governor and 
those in which it is vested in the Crown. It has definitely 
been decided by the Law Officers? that if the power is 
vested in the Crown, the Crown will not exercise that power 
without inquiry ; it will use its power to refer the case to 
the Privy Council under the Act 3 & 4 Will. IV. c. 41, s. 4, 
and the Privy Council will consider whether a case has been 
made out on which the Secretary of State should be advised 
to act. There is no legal necessity to refer to the Privy 
Council, but naturally the Secretary of State in considering 
so grave a matter would prefer to refer to a body skilled in 
Colonial law, and by their weight and knowledge possessing 
an authority which cannot be possessed by any Secretary of 
State. 
On the other hand, though there has been no case of recent 
years, and it may be expected that cases are not very likely 
to arise, it would obviously be a strong matter to refuse to 
accept the petition from two Houses of a Dominion Legisla- 
' Such as railway commissioners, auditors, civil service commissioners, 
and members of the Native Board contemplated in the schedule to the 
South Africa Act, 1909, and members of the Inter-state Commission con- 
templated in the Commonwealth Constitution ; also members of certain 
Commissions, e.g. the Land Tax Commission (Act No. 21 of 1910). 
i See Parl. Pap., August 1862 (Boothby’s case), pp. 68, 69.
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.