Full text: Industrial development in the United States and Canada

1 
 \/ 
1C 
3. 
1 
it 
d 
is 
1 
” 
1 
it 
F 
= 
INDUSTRIAL CHANGES — 1926-1927 
CANADA 
Cities Located in 
Cities Reporting 
Total Gains 
Relocations 
Branches 
New Plants 
Alberta. ............ 
British Columbia . .. . .. 
Manitoba. ........... 
New Brunswick ....... 
Nova Scotia. .........! 
Ontario. ............. 
Quebec. .............| 
Saskatchewan ......... 
ToraL............ 
12 
50 
2 
0 
i 
99 
71 
23 
| ¢ 
z 
37 
52 
[2 
“~A 
oly 
NE hundred and fifty Canadian cities re 
ported a gross gain* of 290 plants em- 
ploying 15,357 people, during the years 
1926 and 1927. These plants included newly 
organized companies, branch plants, and reloca- 
“ions. 
The table above details the distribution of 
‘hese gains among the various Provinces. 
* The term “‘gross gains” is used for the reason that a con- 
siderable part of the relocations consist of firms moving 
from one point to another within the same province. This 
ntra-province movement while representing a gain to 
ipecific cities of a certain province does not, of course, 
represent a net gain to the Dominion. As a part of the 
total gain, however, these intra-province relocations were 
-elatively unimportant. 
Twenty-two firms employing 1,460 people 
went out of business or moved outside of 
Canada during this same period, representing 
the net loss to Canada. 
The average size of plant gained in Canada 
was 53 employees which compares with an 
average of 36 employees for the United States. 
Plants gained by cities located in the Province 
of Quebec averaged 87 people, in Ontario 61, 
in Saskatchewan 35, in Alberta 27, in British 
Columbia 24 and in Manitoba 23. 
Of the 197 new local plants, 14 employed 
100 or more persons. Four of these were pulp 
or paper mills, and the others were distributed 
The table below and those on pages 114 and 115 show the distri- 
bution of plants by provinces and cities classified according to size. 
GAINS IN NUMBER OF PLANTS BY PROVINCES—1926-1927 
Provinces 
Cities Reporting 
Plants Gained 
Intra-Province Relocations 
3 
8 
i 
rn 
£ IN in © ; 
[I N 
La > alg | C 
aN aN MN ~ 
= + ~N 3 
1 be 
lela sl 
= S & i 
8 3 ; > 
o S ‘ 
wy — 
¥ 
| 
I= 
x 
l= 
+ 
— 
2 
= 
< 
wr 
5 
© 
< 
“ 
~ 
. 
™ 
t) 
~ 
3 
- 
to 
« 
© 
@] 
= 
AE 
g 
= |! 
; 
NN 
I's 21 .. 2 
3 Sly 8 
aN aN aN ~ 1 
F + o 2 
S| eslalB| 8 
& S S 9 = 
¢ S, wy cS 
; oS 0D 
< 
v 
— 
Alberta. ....... 
3ritish Columbia . 
Manitoba. ....... 
New Brunswick. . . 
Nova Scotia. ... .. 
Ontario. ......... 
>rince Edward Isl. . 
Quebec. ......... 
Saskatchewan... .. 
L 
| 
“ 
z 
2 
2 
5 
14 
60 
22 
3 
2 
& 
. 
50 
17 
n 
3 
99 
10 
3 
10 
ss 
6 
by 
; 
10 
73 
93 
” 
3 
-
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.