xviii 
TABLE OF CASES CITED 
S.C. 
S.C.R. 
S.R. (N.S. W.) 
S.R. (Qd.) 
Steph. Dig. 
Stuart 
1.8. 
LP 
Tas. L.R. 
U.C.C.P. 
U.C.Q.B. 
V.L.R. 
W.A.L.R. 
W.N. (N.S.W,, &c.) 
W.W & AB. 
Supreme Court of Cape Reports, 
Supreme Court of Canada Reports (from 1878). 
State Reports, New South Wales (from 1901). 
State Reports, Queensland (from 1901), 
Stephen’s Quebec Law Digest. 
Lower Canada Reports (1834). 
Transvaal Supreme Court Reports (to 1909), 
Transvaal Provincial Division Reports (1910 1). 
Tasmania Law Reports. 
Upper Canada Common Pleas Reports. 
Upper Canada Queen’s Bench Reports. 
Victoria Law Reports (from 1875). 
Western Australia Law Reports (from 1900). 
Weekly Notes (New South Wales, &c.). 
Wyatt, Webb, and a’Beckett, Victoria Reports (1864-9). 
Abbott v. City of St. John, 40 S.C.R. 
597: 6721.2, 718 n. 4, 824 n. 1. 
Ackman v. Town of Moncton, 24 N.B, 
103: 718 n. 3, 824 n. 1. 
tn re Adam, 1 Moo.P.C. 460: 392, 
831. 
Adcock v. Aarons, 5 W.AL.R. 140: 
888 n. 1, 908 n. 1. 
Ah Sheung v. Lindberg, [1906] V.L.R. 
323: 879 n.4, 1083 n. 5. 
Ak Yick v. Lehmert, 2 C.L.R. 573: 
874 n. 1. 
Ah Yin v. Chyistie, 4 C.1.R. 1428: 
821 n. 1, 1083 n. 5. 
Alcock v. Fergie, 603. 
Alexandre v. Brassard, [1895] A.C. 
301: 1437 n. 2. 
Algoma Central Railway Co. v. The 
King, [1903] A.C. 478: 423. 
Allen v. Hamson, 18 S.C.R. 677: 
667 n., 715 n. 1. 
2x parte Anderson, 30 L.J.Q.B. 129 : 
1328 n. 2, 
Anderson v. Gorrie, [1895]1 Q.B. 668 : 
1347 n. 1. 
Angers v. The Queen Insurance Co., 
22 L.CJ. 307, at pp. 309, 310: 725 
n. 5. 
Anglo-American Telegraph Co. v. The 
Direct United States Co., 2 App.Cas, 
394: 379. . 
in the Matter of an Arbitration and 
Award between the Province of 
Ontario and the Province of Quebec, 
4 Cart. 712: 760 n. 1. 
Armstrong v. Armstrong, 11 N.Z.L.R. 
201 : 1242 n. 5. 
Armytage v. Armytage, [1898] P. 178: 
1242, 
Ash divorce case, 1242. 
Ashbury v. Ellis, [1893] A.C. 339: 
380. i 
in re Assignees of Manning, 3 Moo.P.C. 
154: 1357 n. 4. 
P Association St. Jean-Baptiste de 
Montréal v. Bélisle, 30 S.C.R. 598 : 
699. 
I Association Si. Jean-Baptiste de 
Montréal v. Brault, 31 S.C.R. 172: 
751 n. 3. 
Attorney-General v. Black, Stuart, 324 : 
146 n. 4. 
Attorney-General v. Flint, 16 S.C.R. 
707: 1350 n. 1. 
Attorney-General v. Goldsbrough, 15 
V.L.R. 638: 729 n.3, 953 n. 1. 
Attorney-General v. Judah, TL.N. 147 : 
146 n. 4. 
Attorney-General v. Niagara Falls 
Footbridge Co., 1 Cart. 813: 700 
n. 5. 
Attorney-General v. Williams, 7 S.R. 
(N.S.W.) 826 : 1441 n.1. 
Attorney-General of British Columbia 
v. Attorney-General of Canada, 14 
S.C.R. 343, at p. 363: 662 n. 1. 
Attorney-General of British Columbia 
v. Attorney-General of Canada, 14 
App.Cas, 295: 762 n. 1. 
Attorney-General for British Columbia 
v. Canadian Pacific Railway Co., 
[1906] A.C. 204 : 713. 
Attorney-General of British Columbia 
3 2 B.C. (Hunter) 196: 
Attorney-General for Canada v. Cain 
and Gilhula, [1906] A.C. 542: 390, 
831, 1318 n. 1. 
Attorney-General of Canada v. Foster, 
2T NB 152: 667Tn 
! Strictly speaking, only from the beginning of the Union, but the whole 
volume is cited as T.P, by the editors. From 1911 the South African Law 
Reports suversede it.