Full text: Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 1)

CHAP. 1] ORIGIN AND HISTORY 51 
in the interests of the natives, free from all parliamentary 
control. But in any case a general election must precede 
any thought of granting responsible government. Such an 
election held in 1890 * resulted in the appointment of fourteen 
members in favour of and ten against responsible govern- 
ment, the majority representing the coast and the border 
districts, where the Boer influence prevailed, and the 
minority coming from Pietermaritzburg and Umvoti. A 
Bill was accordingly drafted by a committee to establish 
responsible government, which made provision for a legis- 
lature of two houses, the upper nominee, for a permanent 
Under-Secretary for Native Affairs, and for the provision of 
an annual sum for native purposes. It was also provided 
that Bills affecting only a class of the population must be 
Passed by a two-thirds majority on the second reading and 
third reading in the Legislative Assembly. The Government 
was to be administered by six ministers, and the constitution 
of the houses could only be altered by the concurrence of 
an absolute majority for the time being of the members 
of both houses on the second and third readings. Provision 
was also made for pensions to officers retiring on political 
grounds.? The Bill was, however, altered in the Council 
80 as to substitute one for two houses. It also pur- 
ported to transfer to the Government of the day all the 
Powers of the Governor as Supreme Chief of the natives, 
which he had exercised hitherto without any control what- 
ever. Native interests were to be protected by reservation of 
bills for the royal assent and by preliminary consideration by 
a committee of the Legislative Council. The Governor, in 
sending home the Bill,2 deprecated the proposal for a single 
chamber, as affording risk of hasty legislation, considered 
that he should be left free to refuse, if he thought fit, 
ministerial advice as to his action as Supreme Chief, though 
he would as a rule accept it, leaving ministers in case of differ- 
ence to initiate legislation to effect their ends, which legisla- 
tion would be reserved for the royal assent. He doubted if 
the provision for the natives was adequate, but he thought 
' Parl. Pap., C. 6487, p- 25. * Tbid., pp. 28 seq. * Ibid., pp. 36 seq. 
"no
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.