Full text: Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 1)

156 THE EXECUTIVE GOVERNMENT [PART II 
in the letters patent has the peculiarity that though it is 
almost invariably inserted it is practically never used. 
It is omitted since 1878 in the case of Canada, the local law 
making adequate provision, also in the case of the Common- 
wealth, which had no lands in 1901, and the Union of South 
Africa ; in the latter case, no doubt, mainly from the fact 
that the model which was followed was that which had been 
laid down in the two cases of the Federations. It is the power 
to make land grants. The power was an important one in the 
old times when the power to grant land was valuable, and 
was exercised under instructions from the Secretary of State, 
but the whole field was gradually covered by legislation, and 
the power became otiose and needless : accordingly in the 
case of Canada it was omitted on the suggestion of Mr. Blake 
in the letters patent issued in 1878. The right has received 
discussion in the Courts in a New Zealand case, but in that 
Dominion now the land is all disposed of under statutory 
authority. 
There is some difficulty as to the clause in the letters 
patent which occurs in nearly all, authorizing the Governor 
to exercise the powers of the Crown as to summoning, dis- 
solving, and proroguing the Legislatures. In the case of 
Newfoundland (as in that of Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, 
and Prince Edward Island before union) there is included 
also a clause empowering the Governor to make laws with 
the advice and consent of the legislative bodies, while the 
numbers of the Council are provided for and their method 
of appointment. In the case of New South Wales, Queens- 
land, and New Zealand, and formerly in the Colony of Natal, 
in addition to the powers of summoning, proroguing, and 
dissolving, are given powers of appointing members to the 
nominee Legislative Councils, and in the case of the Cape, 
as in the case of Newfoundland, the power conferred included 
the power to make laws with the Legislature. The powers 
of summoning, proroguing and dissolving are also given in 
the case of the Federations and of the Union. They were not 
© The Queen v. Clarke, 7 Moo. P. C. 77; Rusden, New Zealand, i. 480; 
of. the South Australia case, The Queen v. Hughes, 1 P, C. 81,
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.