JHAP. IV] THE GOVERNOR AS HEAD 217
met and given a definitive and final decision upon their
merits ; for the House of Commons is the legitimate organ
of the people, whose opinions cannot be constitutionally
ascertained except through their representatives in Parlia-
ment. It is necessary, however, and according to precedent,
that, under such circumstances, the new Parliament should
be called together without delay.’
And on page 513 :(—
‘For, notwithstanding their resignations, the outgoing
Ministers are bound to conduct the ordinary business of
Parliament and of the country so long as they retain the
seals of office. They continue, moreover, in full possession of
their official authority and functions, and must meet and incur
the full responsibility of all public transactions until their
successors have kissed hands upon their acceptance of office.’
And on page 514 :—
It was always the practice to fill up vacancies. Peerages
promised by a Minister’s predecessors in office had been
granted, though no instrument had been signed or sealed on
the subiect.’
In 1858, Lord Palmerston, after his tender of resignation,
and before his successor was appointed, allotted three of
the highest honours of the Crown—three Garters—which
were then unappropriated, to three eminent noblemen, his
friends and supporters. And in 1866, upon the dissolution
of the second Russell Ministry, an office was filled up by
that Government which did not become vacant until two
days after their resignation had been tendered to Her
Majesty. The interference of Parliament with the exercise
of the prerogative under such circumstances has never taken
place, and would only be justifiable under circumstances of
a flagrant character.’
And on page 515 :—
‘The Disraeli Ministry (after its defeat in 1868) appointed
the Earl of Mayo to be Governor-General of India ; but this
appointment, though severely criticized by the Liberal press,
was unquestioned in Parliament.’
In 1852 Lord Derby took office with a minority. The new
Ministers were defeated in the House by 234 to 146, and
dissolved on July lst, 1852. They were beaten at the elec-
tions; but summoned Parliament, and did not resign until
defeated—305 to 286—on the Budget.
In 1859 Lord Derby dissolved on April 19th, and Ministers
were defeated at the polls by 350 to 302, but they met