Full text: Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 2)

832 PARLIAMENTS OF THE DOMINIONS [PARTI 
It was suggested in the correspondence before the passing 
of the Constitution by Sir Napier Broome,! the Governor of 
Western Australia, that provision should be made to prevent 
tacking on the one hand, and on the other to obviate con- 
stitutional deadlocks. But Sir Napier Broome’s suggestion, 
which was by no means a bad one, and which would seem 
to have been dictated by common sense, was not viewed 
with favour either by the Secretary of State for the Colonies 2 
or by the Committee of the Legislative Council of the time, 
which was engaged in the study of the proposed Constitution, 
and the Constitution as it was issued contained no provisions 
on the subject, beyond the provision that appropriation and 
tax Bills must originate in the Legislative Assembly and that 
money votes. or Bills must be recommended by the Governor. 
Things remained comparatively in a satisfactory con- 
dition so long as the Upper Chamber was nominee, as was 
provided in the Act for the first six years, or until the 
population of the Colony attained 60,000 souls; but when 
the Legislative Council was appointed it was at once pro- 
vided by the Act of 1893 3 that in the case of a proposed Bill 
which, according to law, must have originated in the Assem- 
bly, the Legislative Council might at any stage return it to 
the Assembly with a message requesting the omission or 
amendment of any items or provisions, and the Legislative 
Assembly might, if it thought fit, return such omissions or 
amendments with or without alterations. 
The Legislative Council has not hesitated to exercise 
this right, as indeed it is entitled to do, and it has 
maintained a close control over legislation.t so that the 
t See Parl. Pap., C. 5743, pp. 15, 36. He wished the Lower House after 
a period of eight months to be able to pass a Bill over the head of the 
Upper House—a drastic anticipation of the Imperial Parliament Act, 1911. 
* Parl. Pap., C. 5743, pp. 25, 26. Sir H. Holland preferred a nominee 
Upper House, which would in other matters have co-ordinate authority 
with the Lower House, but give way on money matters, as in Queensland. 
* 57 Vict. No. 14, s. 23, repeated in 63 Vict. No. 19, 8. 46. See Parlia- 
mentary Debates, iv. 621. The Council cannot insist on a request: see 
Parliamentary Debates, xxx. 3020, and cf. xxix. 1125, 
¢ Compare its action in 1907 over the Land and Income Tax Bill. which it
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.