CHAP, III] THE CONFERENCE OF 1911 1499
Minister in the Conservative Government, and then one of
the leaders of the Opposition to Sir Wilfrid Laurier’s adminis-
tration, who made use of the subject as a convenient mode of
attacking the Canadian Government for lack of energy in
furthering the interests of the Imperial Conference. He
pointed out that the published papers showed clearly that
the Secretariat had more than fulfilled the duties which
were cast upon them by the resolution of the Colonial Con-
ference of 1907; that all the subjects dealt with by that
Conference had given rise to an elaborate correspondence,
with regard to which indifference and delay had been
shown in a marked degree by the Canadian Government. In
particular he pointed out how extremely slow Canada had
been to reply to the repeated efforts of the Secretary of State
to induce them to submit some subject for consideration at
the Conference of 1911. He contrasted the action of New
Zealand and that of the Commonwealth, both of which had
brought forward a long string of subjects which they desired
to submit to the Conference, while even the Union of South
Africa, despite its recent formation, had sent three or four
subjects which they desired to have discussed. Newfound-
land itself had shown interest in the question of steamship
communication with the United Kingdom, while Canada,
which had brought forward that topic at the Conference of
1907, had since let the matter rest, and had taken no further
action with regard to it.
In reply, Sir Wilfrid Laurier! adopted and repeated the
eulogies pronounced by Mr. Foster on the Imperial Secre-
tariat, showing the advantages of the adoption of the plan of
having a secretariat in preference to the more far-reaching
proposals for an Imperial Council which had been urged
by Mr. Deakin at the Conference of 1907, and which he had
been compelled to criticize on the ground that the time was
not yet ripe for such advanced proceedings. At the same time
he paid a very handsome compliment to Mr. Deakin, whose
absence from the Conference of 1911 he thought was much to
be regretted. His explanation of the failure of Canada to put
* House of Commons Debates, 1910-1, pp. 7524-30.