CATHOLIC SOCIALISTS.
133
sary laws which determine the sequence of natural phenomena.
The consequence is that it is impossible to apply the notion of
justice and right to the relations of capital and labour. These
relations are, they say, regulated by the fatal law of supply and
demand which it is vain to seek to modify. What would be
the good of invoking an alleged right which it is absolutely
impossible to apply ? Labour is a commodity, the price of
which is fixed in the same way as that of all other commodities
by the free bargaining of the two parties. Christianity or
Catholicism have no more business here than if it was a
question of physics or astronomy. This is the way in which
Liberal economics come to deny any rights to the workers.
The Catholico-Socialist print further accuses Economists of
having completely misunderstood the principle of property in
deriving it from labour. Property, it asserts, is a principle
{moment) which is subordinate to labour neither in its origin
nor in its importance. Liberalism has, then, falsified all the
bases of a true civilization, labour, property, liberty, right, and
justice. The influence of this pernicious doctrine must be
broken and annihilated. It leads to revolution. The first
thmg to do is to re-establish the corporations, to regulate
industry, to fix wages by law, while creating a special macis
^rec^t)^ articles of the “Labour Code” (Arääts-
It is easy to understand the success which doctrines of th\.
sort must have met with among that portion of the labouring
class which was not yet completely won over to the a C
religious and atheistic movement preached by the democZL
agitators. They were simply the ideas of Marx and Lassalle
"we^ed^mh a s^^^(:^h^ic v^nWi,and «mn«:ted bv^
few quotations, with the teachings of the Fathers of the Churrh
converted to Socalism, gained the adhesion of two veri
numerous classes that the Social Democrats were unable to
reach. In the first place, they won over the rural proprietors,
and especially the petty aristocracy of the country districts,
the squireens, who, not sharing in the growing wealth of