34 RESPONSIBLE GOVERNMENT [PART 1
of civil servants to appeal to the Secretary of State. But
the Bill still insisted on the powers of the Supreme Chief
being exercised on the advice of the Executive Council.
Sir John Robinson and Mr. G. M. (afterwards Sir George)
Sutton were sent home on a deputation to urge the accep-
tance of the Bill on the home authorities! but the Imperial
Government stood firm, and the Bill was modified in some
particulars, and especially so as to leave out all claim of the
Colonial Government to control the Supreme Chief in his
action. At the same time, the delegates were informed that
the Governor would be instructed to discuss his proposed
actions with them and to secure their concurrence if possible,
and it was anticipated that agreement would be usually
the case.
The Bill so amended was laid before the Legislative
Council, and the Council then dissolved, the elections re-
sulting in the return of ten members in favour of and
fourteen against responsible government. But four of the
members were unseated on an election petition, and first
two and then two more members in favour of responsible
government were returned; the Bill as amended by the
Imperial Government became law as Act No. 14 of 1893,
and responsible government was inaugurated. It has often
been contended that the grant of responsible government
to Natal was premature and unwise, and there is no doubt
that the small size of the Colony, the paucity of the white
population, which was even then vastly outnumbered by
the native population, and the presence in the Colony of
a large number of natives of India whose industry was
essential for the development of the Colony, but whose
presence was, on many grounds, not very acceptable when
their indentures expired and they settled there, combined
to render the experiment a difficult one, and one which
certainly never led to the same satisfactory results as were
manifested elsewhere in the Empire. But the grant can be
justified on the ground that it was practically an essential
preliminary to the possibility of the Colony joining a con-
! Parl. Pap., C. 7013, pp. 39 seq. * Ibid., pp. 41 seq.