A.D. 1776
—1850.
whteh drs-
mppointed
the advo-
sates of
repeal,
the Com-
hination
Acts were
rot re-
ymposed,
758
LAISSEZ FAIRE
McCulloch had argued that peaceful combinations among
workmen might raise the rate of wages in any trade, if they
had fallen below the normal level ; he held that combinations
were powerless to raise wages above the natural rate. He
argued that if they did so temporarily, there would be a
diminution in the opportunities of employment offered by
masters, and that this would soon work the needed cure,
without legislative intervention; he was quite convinced
that the working classes incurred heavy losses and could not
possibly gain by engaging in strikes. It was a great dis-
appointment to the men, who had worked so hard in the
cause of repeal, that the first use which the working classes
made of their freedom was to embark in a course of conduct
that their advocates, as well as their opponents, regarded as
necessarily mischievous, not only to the country as a whole,
but to the operatives in particular. The dislocation of
business in many places became very serious. The Thames
shipbuilding trade was completely disorganised ; despite the
efforts of Hume and Place to prevent them!, the Glasgow
sotton-weavers came out on strike; and there were similar
trade disputes in many parts of the country.
It was little wonder that the great shipowners and other
employers? were roused to demand the re-enactment of the
laws which had been so recently repealed, and drafted a bill
to be laid before Parliament. Mr Huskisson had been much
influenced by the ship-builders?, and the opinion he had held
as to the necessity of retaining the Combination Laws was so
far confirmed by the results, that he was glad to have another
Committee on the subject. According to Place, he intended to
hold a formal enquiry, and thus give apparent sanction to the
determination he had already taken to carry the shipowners’
bill for re-enacting the laws. Hume and Place set themselves
to balk this design: the operatives, who had formerly been
must occasionally take place; money matters can be regulated in no other way
and by no other means; but beyond these there will be very little association of
any kind, nothing deserving the name of combination in the sense this word is
nsually understood.” Observations on Mr Huskisson's Speech on the Laws
relating to Combinations of Workmen (1825), p. 21.
1 Wallas, Life of Francis Place, 218.
2 The great strike of woolcombers at Bradford was imminent, and the
smployers urged the desirability of re-enacting the Laws. Burnley, Wool and
Wool-combing, 168. 8 Wallas, Life of Francis Place, 226. 4 Tb. 226.