SERIES CORRELATED WITH DEPOSITS 195
TABLE 118
CORRELATION OF YEAR-TO-YEAR PERCENTAGE CHANGES OF DISTRICT
RATIOS IN PAIRED SERIES
INDEPENDENT VARIABLE—Ratios of
Time Deposits to Earning Assets
Direction
Amount of Change
-_— 7 17 Average
Percentage Percent-
Groups ape
Number
of
District-
Years
DEPENDENT VARIABLES —Net
Average Percentage Change
Gross
Earnings
> Earning
crates
Total
Expense
o Earning
Aceate
Net
Earnings
o Earning
Accate
T'atal
Increase
Decrease
's and over........
‘oto xs...
to ro...
g (VT -
Und--
NL
and in total expense, and a net decrease (slight) in net earnings.
For those in which time deposits increased by as much as or more
than 10%, there was a net increase in all three series; for those
with increases of less than 10%, the types of change for the dis-
persion groups are less consistent.
While the year-to-year changes in ratios of time deposits to
earning assets were upward in all of the districts, except Minne-
apolis between 1919 and 1920, the ratios of investments to earn-
ing assets in some districts were increasing and in others decreas-
ing from year to year. What were the net directions and changes
in ratios of gross earnings, of net earnings, and of total expense
in districts in which both time deposits and investments were
increasing, and in those in which time deposits were increasing
and investments decreasing? While on the whole, a net increase
in gross earnings of 1.39% is associated with increasing ratios
of time deposits, the rate is increased to 6.60% in the districts
in which ratios of time deposits are increasing and ratios of in-
vestments decreasing. On the other hand, gross earnings ratios
show a net decrease of 3.40% in the districts in which ratios of
both time deposits and investments increase. Not only are gross
earnings ratios relatively low when time deposits and investments
expressed as ratios are high,® but their average net change is
downward when both of these ratios increase from year to year.
The relations of increasing and of decreasing time deposit and
6 See Table 11%, page 194.