<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>The social Theory of Georg Simmel</title>
        <author>
          <persName>
            <forname>Nicholas J.</forname>
            <surname>Spykman</surname>
          </persName>
        </author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt />
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <msIdentifier>
            <idno>1024612627</idno>
          </msIdentifier>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <text>
    <body>
      <div>NUMERICAL RELATIONS OF SOCIAL FORMS 137 
1) 
Nn 
| © 
11 
oe 
Bl. 
Nn 
¢ &amp;x 
Tr 
V 
n 
&amp;lt;1 
on 
r=) 
y 
| 
14 
the reciprocal activities and relationships of its elements 
can crystallize. Out of that necessity are born objective 
structures and norms, official and representative bodies as 
means to preserve the social unity, which small circles can 
dispense with. The formation and function of these special 
structures will be dealt with in the chapter on social pres- 
ervation. They are referred to here because their forma- 
tion is immediately related to the size of the group, and 
hecause they are, as such, characteristic of large groups. 
The formal difference between large and small groups 
is also manifest in the type of norm by means of which the 
group secures its self-preservation. This is most evident 
in the distinction between mores and law. In small groups 
the relationships between individuals are regulated by the 
mores; the large group needs, in addition to these, the law. 
The life of primitive peoples living in small communities 
was entirely regulated by the mores. The mores set the 
norms for the whole of the religious, political, and economic 
life, and covered the entire domain of what appear at pres- 
ent as the spheres of morality, convention, and law. With 
the formation of larger social circles and the combination 
of these small groups in single units, there occurred a differ- 
entiation in fields of different social content and a differ- 
entiation in different kinds of norms. The result had both 
a social and a sociological aspect. Out of the mores differ- 
entiated on the one hand individual morality. on the other 
hand law. In modern society all three forms of norms 
serve to secure an individual behavior in accordance with 
social requirements. 
Society has an interest in the moral perfection of the 
individual only in so far as that moral perfection guaran- 
tees an adequate social behavior. that is. only in so far as 
it regulates social relationships. But in so far as it serves 
that function, it is a highly efficient instrument. It has a</div>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
