<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>The social Theory of Georg Simmel</title>
        <author>
          <persName>
            <forname>Nicholas J.</forname>
            <surname>Spykman</surname>
          </persName>
        </author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt />
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <msIdentifier>
            <idno>1024612627</idno>
          </msIdentifier>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <text>
    <body>
      <div>140 THE SOCIAL THEORY OF GEORG SIMMEL 
determined by that common bond, but merely by the for- 
mal exigencies of the large group. This numerical subdi- 
vision of large groups is a schematic, formal, and mechani- 
cal type of social organization. It makes possible the 
combination of smaller units into larger ones until social 
differentiation and integration shall have given the large 
group a unified organic structure instead of a mechanical 
unity. 
The numerically defined subgroup may have been 
formed out of small organic circles, but its teleological 
significance does not lie in its own structure, but in its ex- 
ternal relationships to the large group. Such an organiza- 
tion makes it possible to maintain the character and the 
structure of the parts independently of the growth of the 
whole. The central administration deals only with ele- 
ments of identical sociological quality, and an extension 
of the group merely means a greater number of elements. 
This type of social organization finds its most complete 
expression in an army. Increase or decrease in size can be 
obtained by simply adding or subtracting a number of 
numerically fixed sociological forms. For that reason it 
has always been used in a more or less pure form for all 
warlike purposes. Nomadic peoples on a campaign of con- 
quest have no other stable social content available as a 
basis for organization and must resort to a formal principle 
which will serve their purpose. The numerical principle is 
the most advantageous one and infinitely superior to the 
kinship organization in that it is less likely to lead to dis- 
ruption through blood feuds. After the conquest, the nu- 
merical principle will often be projected into the adminis- 
tration of the conquered territory until a more factual or 
organic principle can supplant it. 
The advantages of such a subdivision on the numerical 
principle hold, of course, for all magnitudes and are inde-</div>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
