<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>The social Theory of Georg Simmel</title>
        <author>
          <persName>
            <forname>Nicholas J.</forname>
            <surname>Spykman</surname>
          </persName>
        </author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt />
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <msIdentifier>
            <idno>1024612627</idno>
          </msIdentifier>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <text>
    <body>
      <div>190 THE SOCIAL THEORY OF GEORG SIMMEL 
nist movement and the sociological evolution of the con- 
cept “woman.” The original position of the woman was in 
the home. She was absorbed in the family. Her special 
functions, though common to all women, prevented her 
from forming the large superordinated circle including all 
women. Her functions kept her fully bound to the small 
family group and led to an exclusive devotion to a few in- 
dividuals. Her sociological position was that of an indi- 
vidual fully tied up in a small, highly individualized circle. 
The modern industrial development has completely 
changed this situation. Among the working classes, the 
girl and the married woman have been drawn into the fac- 
tory. The process for them has meant an external libera- 
tion from the complete absorption of the home. The same 
changes have brought for the middle-class woman an in- 
ternal liberation. A great number of activities formerly 
carried out in the home have been taken over by industry, 
and this has resulted for her in a greater freedom within 
the home. 
This difference in the results of industrialism for the 
two social classes explains the difference in the immediate 
practical aims of these groups of women. The first wants 
to go back to the home, the second wants to go out of the 
home; the first wants to be more a “family woman,” more 
wife and mother, the second wants to be more a social 
woman, more a political woman. But for both groups the 
binding ties with the smaller circle have been dissolved. 
The complete absorption in the small group has been abol- 
ished, and the barriers against a practical solidarity of 
women have been removed. The concept “woman” is no 
longer a purely logical and abstract concept. It has be- 
come a guiding principle for unitary associations including 
all women, as Is manifest in the different branches of the 
feminist movement. In these associations they can work</div>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
