<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>The social Theory of Georg Simmel</title>
        <author>
          <persName>
            <forname>Nicholas J.</forname>
            <surname>Spykman</surname>
          </persName>
        </author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt />
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <msIdentifier>
            <idno>1024612627</idno>
          </msIdentifier>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <text>
    <body>
      <div>MONEY AND THE STYLE OF MODERN LIFE 247 
ad 
)X- 
nt 
he 
le- 
of 
of 
es 
2S - 
“a- 
80 
he 
in 
he 
-en 
he 
re- 
me 
tal 
of 
1a 
ve 
it 
ar- 
h, 
ics 
if 
1b- 
As 
n- 
it 
an 
= 
tuteness. This double relationship is most clearly manifest 
in the concept of the ego. The ego stands above all of its 
contents, all of its inner oppositions and contradictions. 
But it descends from its lofty position and identifies itself 
closely with some of its contents and tendencies in their 
opposition to others. 
This is also the form of the relation of money to the 
contents of life. In essence it stands above and beyond the 
oppositions and contradictions of life, above and beyond 
the particular tendencies and style forms. Yet, character- 
ized by its indifference to all that is particular and one- 
sided, it nevertheless places itself at the disposal of every 
particular tendency and desire. But here it shows the 
fundamental difference between itself and those other 
forces referred to above. Religion, the state, the absolute 
mind, and the ego—all take one side as against the other 
if they descend to the plane of the particular interests. 
Money, however, serves both sides and all sides. It main- 
tains its all-embracing character also on the plane of the 
particular interests. The objectivity of money is not some- 
thing that really lies beyond the contradictions and is only 
illegitimately used by one of them. Its objectivity signi- 
fies from the start its willingness to serve both sides of the 
contradiction, and its significance for the style of life lies 
therein, that on account of its indifference to all one-sided- 
ness it adapts itself to every one-sidedness. 
The third item which is characteristic for the style of 
life is its tempo. Persistence or change and the relative 
tempo of the latter are immediately characteristic for the 
style of life of a specific period. 
The introduction of money and the growth of the mon- 
ey economy have meant a tremendous increase in the tem- 
po of life. The quick circulation of money and goods, the 
Huctuations in individual wealth, the concentration and</div>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
