<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>The social Theory of Georg Simmel</title>
        <author>
          <persName>
            <forname>Nicholas J.</forname>
            <surname>Spykman</surname>
          </persName>
        </author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt />
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <msIdentifier>
            <idno>1024612627</idno>
          </msIdentifier>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <text>
    <body>
      <div>SUMMARY 
HE two chapters of this book give a brief synopsis 
of Simmel’s social metaphysics as given in his Phi- 
losophy of Money. They illustrate the function of a 
social metaphysics as contrasted with the function of an 
empirical social science and with the philosophic inquiry 
into the presuppositions of the social sciences. They also 
illustrate what his conception of metaphysics and his em- 
phasis on function and thought form rather than on dogma 
and system lead to in practical application. They do not 
lead to a well-rounded, systematic social philosophy. But 
that, according to Simmel, is their strength, not their weak- 
ness. 
Absolute and abstract philosophic systems are too far 
removed and remain too far distant from the single appear- 
ances of practical life to be capable of lifting them out of 
their isolation and relating them to all other appearances 
of life. They fulfil their function of seeing life whole and 
the manifoldness of the cosmos as a unitary totality only 
at the cost of neglecting large numbers of single phenom- 
ena. Simmel’s functional relativism and subtle dialectic 
give the metaphysical thought form a sufficient mobility 
and flexibility to enable it to relate even the most fleeting 
historical appearance on the surface of life to the most fun- 
damental aspects of existence. 
The total inquiry pursued in this third book is a meta- 
physical inquiry. The unity of the single inquiries lies, 
therefore, not in the relation between their propositions 
or in their contribution to a special field of knowledge, but 
in the unitary thought movement which aimed through 
rf</div>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
