<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>The nature of capital and income</title>
        <author>
          <persName>
            <forname>Irving</forname>
            <surname>Fisher</surname>
          </persName>
        </author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt />
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <msIdentifier>
            <idno>102659555X</idno>
          </msIdentifier>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <text>
    <body>
      <div>172 NATURE OF CAPITAL AND INCOME [Cuar. X 
cents. Again, in the comparison between the capitalist’s 
and laborer’s income, we ought to say that the laborer 
who receives $500 a year, with an expenditure of effort 
appraised at $250, is only receiving one half as great an 
income as the capitalist who obtains, during the same 
period, dividends and interest to the extent of $500, with 
no effort whatever. : 
Tt may be asked how an appraisement of labor is possible. 
From a practical or statistical standpoint the appraisement 
is difficult, if not impossible. Yet certain data are obtain- 
able. A servant applying for work asks not simply in 
regard to the wages, but in regard to the difficulty of the 
work, and will consent to do extra or disagreeable tasks only 
on condition of a definite increase in wages. In this case 
we may say that the increase in wages which is necessary 
to procure the consent of the laborer represents subjectively, 
to him or her, the increased difficulty of the work. In like 
manner, a government employee who has at any time the 
option of retiring on half-pay may, at the point when he de- 
cides to retire, be said to regard the difficulty of his work 
as equal in his estimation to half of the income he receives 
for it. 
In general we may say that the proper method of apprais- 
ing the disagreeable element involved in one’s work is to de- 
duet from the gross income that sum which the worker would 
be willing to sacrifice were it possible for him so to avoid the 
disagreeable element. That is, he is supposed to imagine 
an alternative condition, considered as an equivalert in his 
mind to the actual conditions under which he works, but 
which differs from them in two particulars: in being free 
from the labor or pain of toil; and being deprived of a cer- 
tain amount of its earnings or rewards. If, for instance, 
the laborer who obtains $2 a day for eight hours’ work 
estimates that this would be to him the equivalent of $1.50 
without labor, he has virtually made a deduction of 50 
cents a day for the irksomeness of his work.</div>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
