<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>The nature of capital and income</title>
        <author>
          <persName>
            <forname>Irving</forname>
            <surname>Fisher</surname>
          </persName>
        </author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt />
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <msIdentifier>
            <idno>102659555X</idno>
          </msIdentifier>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <text>
    <body>
      <div>Seo. 22] THE RISK ELEMENT 299

at a fixed price which they consider high. Such a contract
to sell is often made in the form of an option, in which
case it is known as a “put.”
To show how such contracts will shift risks, a few examples
 will suffice. A building contractor who had taken a
large contract was asked if he were not taking large risks,
since he could not foreknow the cost of building. He replied,
 “No, I am taking no risks at all except on ‘labor’;
I have made contracts to be supplied with all materials
when needed, at fixed prices.” Those who made these contracts
 thus assumed the risk of fluctuation in price in the
special materials in which they dealt, relieving the contractor
 of the necessity of informing himself of the special
market conditions for stone, brick, timber, etc., and enabling
 him to make a closer bid for the contract, inasmuch
as there was less need of the element of caution. The public,
 of course, get the benefit of such a shifting of risk
in the form of reduced cost of building. Similar results
follow from most other “short” sales. Again, a woolen
manufacturer need not carry so large a stock of wool if he
can make a contract by which some one will sell short, or
agree to supply the wool at fixed prices and at certain
dates. He can afford to use up his present stock fearlessly,
 with the certainty that when it is gone he can
obtain a new supply.! Without such a contract, he would
be under the necessity of carrying a large and idle stock.
An important method of shifting risks is “hedging,”
whereby a dealer, for instance in transporting wheat, may
be relieved of the risk of a change in price. He buys
wheat in the West intending to ship it to New York and
sell it there at enough to cover cost of transportation
and a small profit. In consequence of a sudden fall in
price he might find all his profit wiped out; or he might,
on the other hand, by a rise in price, make much more
than normal profits. But, being of a cautious disposition,

1 Cf. Hadley, Economics, Putnam’s, 1896, p. 106.</div>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
