<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>The Industrial Revolution</title>
        <author>
          <persName>
            <forname>William</forname>
            <surname>Cunningham</surname>
          </persName>
        </author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt />
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <msIdentifier>
            <idno>1027928145</idno>
          </msIdentifier>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <text>
    <body>
      <div>526 
LAISSEZ FAIRE 
a by This unexampled expansion of the industry opened up a 
nd there very much larger field for employment than had been avail- 
was an i able before the era of these inventions. The abundance of 
ny for yarn, especially after 1788, when mule yarns became available, 
was such that the services of weavers were in great demand’, 
and considerable quantities of yarn were sent abroad for use 
on foreign looms. The kinds of labour needed were not very 
different from those required in the old days of hand spinning 
and carding, but girls and women were concentrated in factories 
to tend the machines, instead of spinning with their wheels 
in cottages. This case affords an excellent illustration of an 
important principle in regard to labour-saving machinery ; 
when the improvement renders the article cheaper and there- 
by stimulates the demand, it is quite likely that there will be 
an increased call for labour? because the machine has come 
into use’. The artisans, who thought that such inventions 
must necessarily deprive them of their occupation, were mis- 
taken; the number of hands engaged in the cotton trade 
to-day is undoubtedly very much larger than it was in the 
time of Arkwright. Much remains to be said about the con- 
ditions and terms of employment, but there can be no doubt 
whatever that the introduction of machinery did not diminish 
the numbers occupied in the cotton trade. 
but the The only check to the indefinite expansion of the trade 
pi os lay in the limited supply of water-power available ; that cause 
| for apprehension was removed, however, by the invention of 
Boulton and Watt, and the application of steam as the motive 
power in cotton mills. Though steam engines had long been 
in use for pumping water from mines, the improvements, 
1 Radcliffe, Origin of the New System of Manufacture, p. 65. 
3 Arkwright asserted that when power-spinning was introduced, the spinners 
were not left idle, but were “almost immediately engaged” in weaving or other 
branches of the business. Anstie, Observations, 12 n. 
3 On one of the limiting conditions, see below, pp. 661, 662. Other illustrations 
are furnished by the railways, which by rendering intercommunication cheap have 
developed intercourse of every sort. It is probable that more horses are required 
now, as subsidiary to railway traffic, than were needed in the eighteenth century 
to do all the baunlage by road: there can be no doubt that there is far larger 
employment for men. Other illustrations of an increased demand for labour in 
consequence of the introduction of labour-saving implements are afforded by the 
type-writer and the sewing-machine.</div>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
