<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>The Industrial Revolution</title>
        <author>
          <persName>
            <forname>William</forname>
            <surname>Cunningham</surname>
          </persName>
        </author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt />
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <msIdentifier>
            <idno>1027928145</idno>
          </msIdentifier>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <text>
    <body>
      <div>576 LAISSEZ FAIRE 
however, only able to take full advantage of these great 
spportunities for a few months; the quantity of English 
00ds exported was enormously increased for a time, especially 
in trade with the United States and Brazil. But the stimulus 
given to production was not altogether wholesome; the 
expansion was so rapid that business men had attempted to 
strain their credit to the utmost in order to engage in vast 
speculations, and there was a very serious revulsion when the 
war broke out again in 1803. 
English The final crisis had now arrived in the great struggle 
prosperity tetween France and England for predominance in the world. 
ly founded, T¢ geemed possible that the nineteenth century might reverse 
the story of the eighteenth, and that a rejuvenated France 
might assert a new power against her ancient rival, not only 
in Europe but in India and the West Indies. There was a 
general impression that English prosperity rested on very 
secure foundations, and that these might be completely 
undermined ; this opinion gave rise to much anxiety in 
England, while sanguine expectations of successful rivalry 
were cherished in France. The economic relations of the two 
sountries had been completely reversed since the Restoration 
period; after the Peace of Versailles, France had been 1n 
constant danger of being flooded by English goods, and French 
manufacturers demanded the strenuous enforcement of pro- 
tective legislation in the interest of native industriesl. The 
A.D. 1776 
—1850. 
for 
American 
markets. 
of riches gradually disappeared.” Playtair, Inquiry into the permanent Causes 
of the Decline and Fall of wealthy and powerful Nations, 66. His whole 
account of the decline of Holland is interesting. Her one important manufacture, 
:hat of linen, was weighted by the pressure of taxation in competing with other 
countries, and the increasing use of cotton must surely have affected the demand 
for the higher-priced fabric. The Dutch carrying trade, which had revived during 
the War of Independence, was fatally injured when Holland was forced to side 
against England in the Revolutionary War, and the blows she then received were 
anticipations of the complete destruction of her greatness which ensued, when she 
was drawn by Napoleon into the Continental System. It is not uninteresting to 
notice that these causes of the eventual fall of Holland were noted by Cary, whose 
somments on Dutch trade are instructive. Writing in 1695 be says, * The Trade 
»f the Dutch consists rather in Buying and Selling than Manufactures, most of 
‘heir Profits arising from that and the Freights they make of their Ships. *** 
Such 8 Commerce to England would be of little Advantage no more than jobbing 
for guineas, this Nation would no way advance its Wealth thereby, whose Profits 
lepend on our Product and Manufactures.” Essay on the State of England in 
-elation to its Trade (1695), pp. 123, 124. 
1 Mr Welsford points out the influence of these conditions in bringing about the 
Reien of Terror. Strength of Nations, 188.</div>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
