<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>The Industrial Revolution</title>
        <author>
          <persName>
            <forname>William</forname>
            <surname>Cunningham</surname>
          </persName>
        </author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt />
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <msIdentifier>
            <idno>1027928145</idno>
          </msIdentifier>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <text>
    <body>
      <div>JOINT-STOCK COMPANIES 
819 
The Company were able to limit the quantity of tea imported wi 
and thus to control the price. The method of sale had 
been defined by the Act of 1784, when it was determined 
that the Company should, four times a year, put up for 
auction a quantity of tea, which they supposed would meet but the 
the demand. The upset price was to be such as would gras 
defray the prime cost, freight, etc. The Company however Cine 
calculated these various items on a system which gave rise to 
much complaint. It was held that, if they pushed the sale of 
English manufactures in China, they cculd procure the goods 
on far cheaper terms, that their charges for freight were 
excessive, and that their costly establishments were an un- 
necessary burden. The merchants pointed out that the 
price of tea in Hamburg was about half of that paid at the 
East India auctions in London; but the Company retorted 
that the critics took no account of the difference of quality. 
The interest of the English consumers prevailed, however, 
against a privileged body of traders; and the China trade was 
thrown open in 1833. 
The difficulties which have been found since that time, in 
maintaining satisfactory political relations with the Chinese 
authorities, and in affording protection to and exercising 
authority over European traders, have been very great: it 
may at least be doubted whether the old method of trading, 
through an exclusive company, was not after all well adapted 
bo the circumstances of the country. Till 1838 all trade be- i PO 
bween the Chinese and the outside world had been carried 18:3. 
on through the agency of a corporation of native merchants 
known as the Co-hong, who seem to have exercised the same 
sort of privileges which were formerly bestowed on Gilds 
merchant. They were responsible for one another's debts, an 
arrangement which enabled some of them to trade recklessly 
on credit, and caused frequent difficulty; and a Hongist was 
responsible for the good behaviour of each foreign merchant ®, 
An exclusive mercantile company, like the East India Com- and the 
pany, was organised on lines which they understood ; but the ment of 
; -am well-order- 
Chinese had no respect for the civilisation, or powers, of ed trade 
European States. The policy of the East India Company, Tyo, the 
1 J. F. Davis, The Chinese (1840), 46. 3 Ib. 47, 60. 
52.9</div>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
