<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Procedures in employment psychology</title>
        <author>
          <persName>
            <forname>Walter Van Dyke</forname>
            <surname>Bingham</surname>
          </persName>
        </author>
        <author>
          <persName>
            <forname>Max</forname>
            <surname>Freyd</surname>
          </persName>
        </author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt />
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <msIdentifier>
            <idno>173623112X</idno>
          </msIdentifier>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <text>
    <body>
      <div>EMPLOYMENT PSYCHOLOGY
(42) o=V Npq
N is the number of cases, p the proportion of these cases
giving one answer to the item, and ¢ the proportion giving
the other answer.
We have described the practical procedure to be followed
when the success of the applicant is to be predicted from a
measurement. The measurement may be a test score, a
questionnaire item, an interview rating, or any one of the
facts about an applicant’s personal history which can be
quantified and correlated with a criterion of successful accomplishment.
 In actual practice, probability of success is,
of course, usually predicted from a combination of such
items. The more information the better, provided its significance
 is known and not merely guessed at. When predicting
 success from a number of such measurements it is
necessary to combine them in such a way that the resulting
total score will have maximum predictive value. This procedure
 forms the subject of the next chapter.

202
1</div>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
