IMMIGRATION PRIOR TO 1890 the probable maximum and minimum limits of the typical lag. An examination of the curve of imports from 1820 to date (on both the calendar year and fiscal year basis after 1870) and a comparison with the curve for total immigration, indicates that Immigration probably lags behind imports a few months, the period evidently being nearer six months than a full year and possibly less than six months. A similiar serutiny of the pig iron and immigration curves from 1854 to date reveals a similiar tendency for some laginimmigration of an apparent length of less than one year, as evidenced by the fact that, in about half of the instances, the troughs and peaks are reached in the same year by the immigration and pig iron curves, and, in the other half, the annual immigration movement reaches the corresponding maximum or minimum a year later than pig iron. It remains to examine the question of lag more closely with the aid of quarterly and monthly data and by numerical computation of the allowance for lag which gives the highest degree of correlation between immigration and industrial activity. Numerical Computation of the Typical Lag. In the usual statistical terminology, the arithmetic evidence of the lag giving the closest correspondence between the curves may be expressed by the following summary: Correlation coeffcient when the gwen number of years Period compared lag is imputed to immigration as compared with pig iron. No lag One year Two years 1857-1914 +.64 +.35 —_ 3 1857-1919 +.51 +.27 — 1872-1914 +.78 +.48 J This numerical interpretation of the statistical evidence, in terms of the coefficient of correlation, indicates that the closest relation- ship is found between pig iron and immigration when the years between the Civil War and the Great War are selected for study and it is assumed that such lag as may exist is less than one year. COMPARISONS BASED UPON QUARTERLY DATA: 1868-1889 Male Immigration. Quarterly immigration data are available by sex beginning with the quarter ending September 30, 1856. For reasons previously 5