<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Proceedings of the South &amp; East African combined agricultural, cotton, entomological and mycological conference held at Nairobi, August, 1926</title>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt />
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <msIdentifier>
            <idno>1738588467</idno>
          </msIdentifier>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <text>
    <body>
      <div>PART TI 
CHAPTER III.—INDUSTRIAL ALCOHOL. 
THE ECONOMICS OF INDUSTRIAT, ALCOHOL MANUFACTURE 
FROM AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS. 
Mr. FOX read the following paper (referred to in the agenda as 
L.CAC AZ. Tyo 
The requirements of motor transport during recent years have 
increased the demand for liquid fuels to such an extent that consump- 
tion is tending to exceed production. Practically all the fuel used is 
obtained from crude petroleum and whilst there is no shortage at 
present, considerable doubt exists as to the sufficiency of future 
supplies, for it appears to be the general opinion that reserve supplies 
will be exhausted within a short period. The seriousness of this 
prospect has led to considerable investigation into the possibilities of 
producing alternative fuels and of these fermentation alcohol is 
commanding much attention. 
There are great possibilities in the use of agricultural alcohol fo 
bower purposes, but the danger exists that it may receive its death 
blow in competition with fuels produced by the liquefaction of coal or 
alcohol synthesised from water and carbonaceous matter. Bearing in 
mind the probability of serious competition by these other liquid fuels. 
alcohol will be considered as a possible rival to the fuel now holding 
the market, namely petrol. 
1. EXTENT oF SUPPLIES: Since alcohol is produced from plants 
directly by the fermentation of sugar, and indirectly by the conversion 
of starch and cellulose, the rasources, unlike those of petroleum, are 
practically inexhaustible, and production might be expanded almost 
indefinitely. 
2. Yierps: The yields of aleohol from raw material and motor 
spirit from crude petroleum compare favourably with each other. 
3. Costs or Propuction: Here petroleum has the advantage, for 
although the cost of refining crude petroleum is about the same as 
that of manufacturing alcohol, a large and readily available supply of 
petroleum is obtained for the cost of merely sinking the well, whereas 
alcohol has to bear the recurrent costs of growing, harvesting, and 
handling large quantities of raw material. Further, in the petroleum 
industry, productive costs are reduced te a mimimum by utilising the 
bye-products, all of which are marketable, and if the manufacturing 
costs of alcohol are to be kept low, it will be essential to utilise the 
distillation residues which possess a certain manurial and feeding 
value. © These residues contain the whole of the fertilisating 
ingredients taken by the plant from the soil, and by returning them to 
the soll, either directly, or by feeding to stock, the alcohol will be 
obtained at the expense of the elements of air and water. 
It has been difficult at short notice to obtain data to enable a 
comparison to be made between the actual costs of producing petrol 
and alcohol, but the little information which it has been possible to 
collect should prove sufficient for arriving at some approximation. 
Cost or PropuciNG PETROL: Numerous estimates have stated the 
average cost of producing a gallon of petrol and delivering to steamer 
for export to be 6d.—7d. and the Standing Committee on the 
Investigation of Prices (1920-1921) estimated the maximum cost to be 
10d. 
A()</div>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
