<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Proceedings of the South &amp; East African combined agricultural, cotton, entomological and mycological conference held at Nairobi, August, 1926</title>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt />
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <msIdentifier>
            <idno>1738588467</idno>
          </msIdentifier>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <text>
    <body>
      <div>PART IV. 1
Mr. HARGREAVES suggested that humidity was the controlling
factor, but Mr. Ritchie was of the opinion that extremes of any sort,
e.g., over-shading, insufficient shade, excess of humidity, ete., induced
the disease.
Mr. WILKINSON, from experience in Kenya and Uganda,
thought that temperature was the controlling factor. Trees which
had over-cropped were more severely affected but the disease was
capable of attacking a healthy tree.
Miss WELSFORD said that there were insufficient trees in
Zanzibar to justify any conclusion. The few trees, that are there,
crop heavily, although Hemileia is present. The trees were not cared
for but were fairly well shaded.
MerHops oF CoMBATTING COFFEE LEAF Disease (Hemileia vastatriz).
Mr. McDONALD made the following statement :
The methods advocated in Kenya are preventive, not curative.
When the leaf disease fungus has successfully invaded a coffee leaf
there is no method of destroying the parasite without also killing the
leaf.
Chief importance is attached to measures designed to promote
the general vigour of the coffee bush and, consequently, its resistance
to disease. To this end plantations should be kept well cultivated
and should not be allowed to become over-run with weeds. Excessive
humidity must be avoided by attention to ventilation: this includes
proper pruning and the regulation of shade and wind-breaks to allow
free access of air.
Diseased leaves are sources of infection, and must not be allowed
to remain on the ground; they should either be burned or buried.
The latter is the better method as it does not result in loss of valuable
humus. Branches which hang down close to the ground should be
removed, as they are particularly liable to become infected from
fungus spores splashed up from the soil in drops of rain.
Liberal dressings of farmyard manure are valuable in assisting
coffee bushes to recover from any special strain, such as over-bearing,
to which they may have been subjected: this assistance helps them
to resist attack by leaf disease.
Finally, in Kenya the disease may be considerably checked by
spraying with $9, Bordeaux or Carbide mixture. In most parts of the
country quicklime, which is necessary for the proper manufacture of
the former spray, is not available and this fact has led to the adoption
of Calcium Carbide in place of the lime. The formula for the 39%
Carbide mixture is as follows: —
2 lbs. Copper Sulphate (Bluestone).
12 ozs. Caleium Carbide.
40 gallons water.
To make the spray, the Bluestone is first dissolved in the water in a
wooden barrel, and the Carbide is then added. a little at a time, out
of doors.
In districts where leaf disease is prevalent, two sprayings are
recommended, the first to be completed before the advent of the main
rainy season, and the second to be carried out as weather conditions
permit, about two months later. The special obijeet of the second

20)</div>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
