<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Proceedings of the South &amp; East African combined agricultural, cotton, entomological and mycological conference held at Nairobi, August, 1926</title>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt />
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <msIdentifier>
            <idno>1738588467</idno>
          </msIdentifier>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <text>
    <body>
      <div>PART V. i 
This review, lengthy as it may be, does no more than pte to 
indicate broadly what is the agricultural position In this I wi 
Let me conclude by saying that it 1s hoped that you will find interes 
in Kenya's progress and problems. It is believed that your ne 
here and the experience you bring to this, the first Agricultura 
Con‘erence held in East Africa, will assist the country generally in 
promoting its agricultural industry, and speaking for the staff of the 
Agricultural Department, we extend to you a cordial welcome. 
HIS EXCELLENCY said that he took a. daily interest in 
agricultural subjects and was glad to hear Mr. Holm’s clear review of 
agriculture in Kenya. Directors of Agriculture constantly required 
more funds for their department and it was not often possible to 
satisfy all their needs. A large proportion of the available funds had 
been set aside in Kenya for research and experimental work and he 
was hoping to see Kabete opened shortly as a centre of veterinary 
research for Fast Africa. Any suggestions which the Conference 
could make to assist experimental and research work would be gladly 
welcomed. 
CHAPTER IIL 
ECONOMIC PROGRESS OF THE TANGANYIKA TERRITORY. 
Mr. KIRBY made the following statement: — 
As the paper* on this subject that has been put before you during 
the Conference is rather statistical than attractive I propose with the 
permission of the Chairman to deal with the subject in a more 
congenial manner. The idea in writing the paper was, to begin with, 
to give members of the Conference some notion of what Tanganyika 
produces, and how she has grown in economic importance since the 
occupation by the Germans. 
Our first most important agricultural activity is the entirely non- 
native production of sisal, in regard to which our aim is first to equal 
the German production. As you see from the table accompanying 
the paper our present production of sisal is three and a half thousand 
hundredweight, as against the German production of four thousand 
hundredweight; but it will be found that, owing to the increases in 
prices since the war, our value is greater than that of the Germans; 
our production ,as you are no doubt aware, has been kept back by the 
war conditions during the time of which the sisal estates were largely 
allowed to lapse into ruinate condition. After that time, estates fell 
into the hands of the earlier lessees who took all they could out of 
them, putting nothing back. Our greatest difficulty about sisal 
expansion in Tanganyika is the water problem. There are very large 
areas where it is possible to grow the crop with the greatest success— 
they are most suitable areas; but as many of us know, for modern 
methods of decortication, we require more than a moderate supply of 
water; and it is that which is the difficulty. Some of us have heard 
recently of a peripatetic decorticator that saunters through the 
plantation, carrying the leaves with it and tearing the fibre out of them 
as it goes: but it does not seem as vet to be a practical possibility. 
* T.C.(C)Ag.10. For text of paper see Appendix. 
250</div>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
