<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Proceedings of the South &amp; East African combined agricultural, cotton, entomological and mycological conference held at Nairobi, August, 1926</title>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt />
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <msIdentifier>
            <idno>1738588467</idno>
          </msIdentifier>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <text>
    <body>
      <div>264 PART WV. 
- Regarding the relative proportions of non-native and native 
production for export in the Territory, given by value in the second 
table of the paper, it may surprise some that these prove to be about 
equal. But for sisal, however, as the table shows, non-native export 
would be less than one half that of native; and there is the further 
circumstance that the conditions of the year taken as an illustration 
were such as to reduce considerably native production. 
I may say in conclusion that Tanganyika is a territory largely 
surrounded by other territories, whose good example and enterprise it 
admires, and whose advice it craves. It is a coveted territory, a 
considerable proportion of which one of its neighbours has already 
threatened to bite off: and I might also refer to a smaller neighbour 
to the south-west, which, I am informed, wishes to imitate the small 
snake which tried to digest the large stone dog! Although I do not 
wish to assist in this painful piecemeal way of dissolution, I shall be 
glad to reply to any questions on the Territory which any members 
of the Conference might wish to put. 
The CHAIRMAN (Mr. Holm) asked whether Government levied 
any charges for the services rendered in respect of the native coffee 
industry, particularly in connection with marketing. 
Mr. KIRBY said that no charge was levied. 
In reply to Mr. Bailey, Mr. Kirby stated that the production of 
kapok was largely in the hands of non-natives, and that the export 
amounted to some 60 tons per annum. They looked upon the kapok 
industry, however, as a menace to the cotton industry on account of 
the fact that kapok harbours cotton stainers. some of the most 
dangerous pests of that crop. 
Mr. SIMPSON proposed a hearty vote of thanks to Mr. Kirby for 
his illuminating picture of the agricultural development in Tanganyika 
Territory. It had been a great pleasure to listen to him, because he 
had drawn his picture so graphically that they would all carry away 
a very clear impression of what present conditions were in Tanganyika. 
CHAPTER IIL 
AGRICULTURAL SHOW. 
The CHAIRMAN (Mr. Holm) read extracts from a letter from the 
Agricultural and Horticultural Society of Kenya, and stated that he 
wished to place the matter before the delegates at the Conference, in 
order to ventilate the subject and to see whether Agricultural 
Departments were able to recommend their Governments to support 
the proposals to hold an Agricultural Show representative of Kast 
Africa at Nairobi about July. 1927. 
In reply to Mr. Fuller, Mr. Holm stated that he understood that 
if the Show took place the Trade Commissioner for South Africa might 
be able to arrange for some exhibition representative of the South 
African Agricultural industry. : 
Mr. SIMPSON said that there was no doubt that most of the 
work in connection with such a Show would fall on the various 
Departments of Agriculture. He had only one officer who could be 
deputed for such work, and he did not feel inclined to put this burden 
upon him, as his energies could be better devoted to work in Uganda.</div>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
