<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Proceedings of the South &amp; East African combined agricultural, cotton, entomological and mycological conference held at Nairobi, August, 1926</title>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt />
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <msIdentifier>
            <idno>1738588467</idno>
          </msIdentifier>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <text>
    <body>
      <div>PART V. _73
Technical specialists have nothing to do with the framing of such
policy or procedure. This is a matter lying between the Director of
Agriculture and the Government which he serves, with due regard to
the desires of, and co-operation with, institutions (such as the British
Cotton Growing Association and the Empire Cotton Growing
Corporation) organised at home for large treatment of the work in
hand : institutions which may or may not assist with provision for the
supply of the technical officers concerned.
Where technical officers are supplied by such institutions as the
above, their work will of course be devised according to the wishes of
those institutions, which will doubtless desire to consult the Director
of Agriculture concerned, before deciding the matter. These technical
officers will submit their schemes of work, based on the general plan,
to the Director, for consultation.
In such a case as this, if the technical officers are using part of
an agricultural station belonging to the Department of Agriculture,
experience has shown that the labour required for their work should
be allocated to those officers by the agricultural officer in charge of the
station, on a scale decided in mutual consultation, with reference to
the Director of Agriculture if and as required. It has shown, further,
that it is best for the agricultural officer to be in general charge of
all labour employed, recruiting, care of labourers, payment of wages,
etc., all being in his hands alone, with the manifest exception that
technical officers will obtain any skilled labour that they may wish
for, and that may be available, the care, ete., of such labour being
in the hands of the Agricultural Officer, as for ordinary labour.
Where technical officers are supplied from the funds of an
Agricultural Department, the control of them and their work will be
in all respects the same as that for ordinary agricultural officers.
Where there is allotted to such officers for their work part of a
general agricultural station, the care, ete., of the labour will be in the
hands of the agricultural officer as above, the division and supply of
labour being decided among those officers in mutual consultation with
reierence as requisite, as described already.
Technical specialists provided institutionally (see above) will
report to the supplying institution, with copies to the Director of
Agriculture who will comment and recommend on them to the
the Chief Secretary who will in turn communicate the comments, ete.,
to the Secretary of State for transmission to the institution concerned.
Technical specialists supplied Governmentally will report in the
manner of an ordinary agricultural officer.
In the case of technical specialists provided institutionally at
first, and then acquired by Government after a period of time, it seems
fair that after such acquisition copies of their reports should continue
to be supplied direct to the institution originally providing them, and
that the institution in question should continue to possess the right
to comment and recommend on such reports, as considered requisite,
through the Secretary of State, the Director of Agriculture concerned
giving through his Government any requisite information and the
reasons why any activities under the above recommendation have not
been or will not be undertaken.

on</div>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
