<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Valuation, depreciation and the rate base</title>
        <author>
          <persName>
            <forname>Carl Ewald</forname>
            <surname>Grunsky</surname>
          </persName>
        </author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt />
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <msIdentifier>
            <idno>174667931X</idno>
          </msIdentifier>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <text>
    <body>
      <div>186 VALUATION, DEPRECIATION AND THE RATE-BASE 
The total required earnings appear largest for the Unlimited 
Life Method for the reason that the required earnings in the 
early years of the plant’s life are supposed to have been low. 
When rates are to be fixed for a public service property which 
is long established, concerning which past records are unrelia- 
ble, but which is legitimate, rendering a necessary service and 
entitled to fair income, the question as to which method of 
procedure should be adopted presents itself. 
Let it be supposed that the records indicate a fairly normal 
development and growth with some years of inadequate earnings 
and no conclusive evidence that any part of the invested capital 
has been repaid, but that worn-out parts have been renewed as 
necessary and that the service rendered has been satisfactory. 
In this assumed case the application of the various methods 
of procedure will theoretically produce results as shown in Table 
14. If any of the methods except the Unlimited Life Method 
be adopted, recourse will probably be had to an addition of 
large values for intangible elements in order that no injustice 
may be done to the owner of the property. In most cases the 
Unlimited Life Method will be indicated as most nearly equi- 
table. This will be yet more apparent when the effect of the 
non-agreement of actual with probable life upon the application 
of the various methods of procedure is taken into account. 
The comparison of results by the methods of procedure which 
have been under discussion has been visualized, for the special 
case of a single item which cost $100, in a diagram, Fig. 2. 
It has been assumed in the preparation of this diagram that in 
the application of the Unlimited Life Method to a single article 
the replacement requirement will be anticipated and will be 
estimated by the compound interest Sinking Fund Method. In 
the practical application of this method a close approximation 
of the replacement requirements is not essential because no part 
of the replacement increment goes to the repayment of capital. 
This entire increment remains in the replacement account and 
will be subject to being decreased or increased from time to 
time as this account shows to be necessary.</div>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
