THE MERITS OF BANKS 
21 
prohibition by the constitutions which some of the states adopted 
during these decades. 
With the very desirability of banks so moot a question, no 
small part of the literature on banking was concerned with the 
economic influence of the institution and its relative merits and 
demerits. To this problem we now turn. 
In the colonial period, we have already observed, the concep- 
tion of a bank was quite different from that of our own time, and 
this must be borne in mind in interpreting the bearing of the 
colonial views concerning the utility of banks upon those of the 
period in which our primary interest lies. For the most part, the 
colonists meant by a bank little more than an emission of paper 
money, with infrequent provision for convertibility on demand; 
and less continuity can be established between their general con- 
clusions as to the desirability of banks and the views of the later 
writers, than between the lines of reasoning by which each arrived 
at the conclusions. 
The first important discussion of the merits of banks of the 
modern type occurred in Pennsylvania soon after the Revolution, 
when the repeal of the charter of the Bank of North America 
was being considered. In 1785 a bill? was introduced to repeal 
the charter which the state had granted three years before, and 
a spirited controversy followed. Mathew Carey has, fortunately, 
preserved for us a record of the debate in the General Assembly? 
to which we have to add several pamphlets that were called 
forth by the issue. 
The advantages ascribed to banks in this early discussion 
were chiefly that they (1) make for punctuality in payments; 
1 The original constitutions of both Iowa (1846-1857) and Texas (1843), 
for example, contained such clauses. Not until 1904 did Texas grant any state 
charters to banks, although a loophole was found in the constitution for the practice 
of private banking. 
Sumner states that in 1852 banking was illegal in nine of the states and in the 
District of Columbia. (History of Banking in the United States, p. 415.) 
2 The bill was enacted in September of that year. In 1787 the bank, which had 
continued in business in the meantime, was given a new charter. 
3 Carev. Debates and Proceedings of the General Assembly (1786).