<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Banking theories in the United States before 1860</title>
        <author>
          <persName>
            <forname>Harry Edward</forname>
            <surname>Miller</surname>
          </persName>
        </author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt />
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <msIdentifier>
            <idno>1755492553</idno>
          </msIdentifier>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <text>
    <body>
      <div>100 BANKING THEORIES IN UNITED STATES 
monetary standard prevents the enlarged circulation from doing 
any additional work.! 
That banks furnish an inexpensive substitute for metallic cur- 
rency, as explained by Smith, was, however, one of the major 
advantages most frequently ascribed to them after 1825. But 
Smith’s doctrine was based on the belief that any tendency of 
bank notes to become excessive in quantity would immediately 
bring about a readjusting specie outflow. Not all were ready to 
concede this. Many thought that serious price disturbances took 
place before the redundant currency was drained off. Banks thus 
provided an inexpensive currency, but one that fluctuated in 
value. 
Smith had dealt with this contention himself, and had main- 
tained that convertibility precludes the possibility of a bank-note 
currency becoming excessive. This view, adopted by the Bullion- 
ists of England, received rather little support in America. Con- 
vertibility, it was commonly thought, does indeed prevent a 
permanent excess of bank notes, but not a temporary one. And 
this excess, even though short-lived, may be very considerable. 
A number of writers observed that, when the corrective export of 
specie occurs, the banks, in order to sustain their reserve ratio, 
must contract their note issue by several times the amount of the 
loss of specie, thus multiplying the depressing effect of a gold 
outflow. 
Another theory, likewise transplanted from England, was that 
bank notes cannot be overissued because they are emitted only in 
response to the demands of trade. So sweeping a thesis had little 
support; but the more modest claim that bank notes do not admit 
of overissue if emitted only against real commercial paper (as 
distinguished from accommodation bills) was rather widely ac- 
cepted. A few writers recognized, however, that the needs of 
trade, as indicated by the volume of bills of exchange offered for 
discount, may themselves become unhealthily inflated as the 
result of a rising price level. 
The votaries of the theory that the quantity of bank notes is 
1 This reasoning involved the fallacy of overlooking the fact that the interest 
itself is paid in the depreciated currency.</div>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
