<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Banking theories in the United States before 1860</title>
        <author>
          <persName>
            <forname>Harry Edward</forname>
            <surname>Miller</surname>
          </persName>
        </author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt />
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <msIdentifier>
            <idno>1755492553</idno>
          </msIdentifier>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <text>
    <body>
      <div>PRINCIPLES OF NOTE ISSUE 167 
upon the duty of banks to care for the wants of their immediate 
vicinity, with little regard to the merits of an elastic flow of funds 
from one point to another. Charters and statutes frequently re- 
stricted the power of the banks to make loans on distant paper, 
and the bank commissioners of the New England states depre- 
ciated such “foreign loans” in a number of their reports.! The 
independent banking system that prevailed in most parts of the 
country undoubtedly contributed to this narrow conception of 
the scope of banking. 
1 
See, in this regard, the next chapter.</div>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
